From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D69F138010 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5236E09DC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AECE09CF for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Nyx.local (unknown [94.163.172.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC62A1B41F0 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50326714.6000603@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:34:28 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120808 Thunderbird/15.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 References: <86wr1tcz8f.fsf@gmail.com> <86d333cngt.fsf@gmail.com> <5020DD0A.3030506@gentoo.org> <86ipct6k80.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <50235319.5000504@gentoo.org> <867gt75uab.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5024CB9F.4060906@gentoo.org> <86y5lml15i.fsf_-_@gentoo.org> <86vcgpj8d8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5028BBBE.6060109@gentoo.org> <861uj8faqh.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <502C1903.1090805@gentoo.org> <86628jdyf6.fsf@gmail.com> <86y5leaxhd.fsf@gmail.com> <502DF2C5.5090209@gentoo.org> <86haryqn5x.fsf@gmail.com> <5031F272.3060907@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f1ede41d-3cb6-4991-822c-4f6a01b73498 X-Archives-Hash: 8a8ab63bf9aca0b42cecd54d0e4ba538 On 8/20/12 12:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Seems like the best comparisons are between linux-based systems of > identical configuration. Crossing OS boundaries might also be useful > but obviously you aren't going to be testing systemd that way. I do not care about systemd at all. I care about fixing a problem in what I'm using. If openrc is really slow on reboot and boot I'd like to figure out why it isn't for me. (compared to the OS touted as the best for user experience.) > Perhaps do a test with both a desktop-like and server-like > configuration (the latter having a LAMP-like set of services, perhaps > samba, postfix, etc - though in a serious production environment those > would be more isolated). A serious production environment nowadays has each of them running separately I guess. lu