From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666021381F4 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E1EE21C05B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27819E075E for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Nyx.local (dynamic-adsl-84-221-248-58.clienti.tiscali.it [84.221.248.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C42411B4003 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <502DF2C5.5090209@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:29:09 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120808 Thunderbird/15.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 References: <86wr1tcz8f.fsf@gmail.com> <86d333cngt.fsf@gmail.com> <5020DD0A.3030506@gentoo.org> <86ipct6k80.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <50235319.5000504@gentoo.org> <867gt75uab.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5024CB9F.4060906@gentoo.org> <86y5lml15i.fsf_-_@gentoo.org> <86vcgpj8d8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5028BBBE.6060109@gentoo.org> <861uj8faqh.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <502C1903.1090805@gentoo.org> <86628jdyf6.fsf@gmail.com> <86y5leaxhd.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86y5leaxhd.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 68545406-22cc-4489-9aff-6ec4ae2ec430 X-Archives-Hash: 38959963f144171146883f3cdbae3989 On 8/17/12 7:39 AM, heroxbd@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, Rich, > > Rich Freeman writes: > >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:38 AM, wrote: >>> Luca Barbato writes: >>>> Were is it? I'd like to read it =) >>> >>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems >>> >>> And the "counter systemd" talk page, >>> >>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems >> >> Just a comment on this - OpenRC is listed as having parallel startup >> support, but I believe that this configuration is actually considered >> unsupported on Gentoo even if the code is there. I believe even the >> configuration options were removed from the config file to discourage >> their user (though if somebody happens to know about the option they >> can add it in and it will work. >> >> It is probably worth noting that this is an experimental feature in a >> comparison. > > Thanks a lot for the comment. I agree. Nobody cares about the tiny (not > tested) booting up time gain with rc_parallel. It can be not so tiny, surely busybox+openrc gives a better gain in many cases. > I think it was "Parallel service startup - OpenRC - yes(buggy)" in wiki > before. Keep it like this, help on making it non-buggy is welcome lu