From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:29:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502DF2C5.5090209@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86y5leaxhd.fsf@gmail.com>
On 8/17/12 7:39 AM, heroxbd@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi, Rich,
>
> Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:38 AM, <heroxbd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> writes:
>>>> Were is it? I'd like to read it =)
>>>
>>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems
>>>
>>> And the "counter systemd" talk page,
>>>
>>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems
>>
>> Just a comment on this - OpenRC is listed as having parallel startup
>> support, but I believe that this configuration is actually considered
>> unsupported on Gentoo even if the code is there. I believe even the
>> configuration options were removed from the config file to discourage
>> their user (though if somebody happens to know about the option they
>> can add it in and it will work.
>>
>> It is probably worth noting that this is an experimental feature in a
>> comparison.
>
> Thanks a lot for the comment. I agree. Nobody cares about the tiny (not
> tested) booting up time gain with rc_parallel.
It can be not so tiny, surely busybox+openrc gives a better gain in many
cases.
> I think it was "Parallel service startup - OpenRC - yes(buggy)" in wiki
> before.
Keep it like this, help on making it non-buggy is welcome
lu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 8:58 [gentoo-soc] report 7.16-7.23: improving OpenRC heroxbd
2012-08-07 4:53 ` [gentoo-soc] report 7.24-8.7: " heroxbd
2012-08-07 9:16 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-08 23:24 ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.8: " heroxbd
2012-08-09 6:05 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-10 2:56 ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.9: " heroxbd
2012-08-10 8:51 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-11 0:31 ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.10: " heroxbd
2012-08-11 23:50 ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.11: " heroxbd
2012-08-13 8:33 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-15 15:14 ` [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 heroxbd
2012-08-15 21:47 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-16 8:38 ` heroxbd
2012-08-16 11:41 ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-17 5:39 ` heroxbd
2012-08-17 7:29 ` Luca Barbato [this message]
2012-08-17 11:56 ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-20 3:04 ` heroxbd
2012-08-20 8:16 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 10:25 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-08-20 16:32 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 18:25 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-08-20 10:47 ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-20 16:34 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 18:12 ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-20 18:28 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 16:15 ` EBo
2012-08-21 14:07 ` heroxbd
2012-08-21 15:55 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-22 2:04 ` heroxbd
2012-08-22 7:35 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-27 10:46 ` Patrick Lauer
2012-08-27 12:37 ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-27 13:29 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-27 14:10 ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-27 14:35 ` Luca Barbato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502DF2C5.5090209@gentoo.org \
--to=lu_zero@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox