public inbox for gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] report 8.8: improving OpenRC
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:05:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50235319.5000504@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ipct6k80.fsf_-_@gmail.com>

On 08/09/2012 01:24 AM, heroxbd@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Guys and Gals,
> 
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> writes:
> 
>> On 8/7/12 6:53 AM, heroxbd@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> After the mid term evaluation, this project shifts its emphasis from
>>>> Prefix support to improving OpenRC (borrowing ideas from brother
>>>> systems)
>>>>
> 
>>>         The process is documented at http://wiki.debian.org/OpenRC
> 
> This wiki page is finished, and passed a first round of critisism
> from #debian-devel. We are expecting it more ;) 
> 
>>>>       3. Patch OpenRC build system to respect EPREFIX (yes, take this by myself)
>>>
>>>         I reviewed my old patch at bug 415899, and it seems to be able to
>>>         serve as a base for the prefix integration.
> 
> If this will not be included in a timely manner (OpenRC herd is loaded
> with tons of bugs), I'll continue improve on my overlay.
> 
>>> bonus:
>>>
>>>     ccxCZ from #openrc made a GLEP draft
>>>
>>>          http://wpr.cz/ccx/wobsite/article/openrc-supervisor.html
>>>     The interesting point to me is to make openrc running closely
>>>     with daemontools and runit for extended features.
>>>     In this project proposal, modern extensions (a timer, a oom-killer, a
>>>     daemon watcher) were discussed. To make openrc friendly talk to other
>>>     tools (cron, incron, runit, etc.) to achieve these extensions are
>>>     closest to my heart.
>>
>> =) I'm looking forward to see some of those implemented.
> 
> runit and deamontools and foreground things look really cool.
> 
> bonus things finished on 8.8:
> 
>   tested out runit: it is a good piece of work. I began to doubt why
>     systemd would reinvent the wheel for a "built-in" supervisor.

keeping all the eggs in a single basket is a problem IMHO.

> Plans for 8.9
> 
>   1. foreground some process (ssh, tinc, nginx and squid) and train openrc to
>     run them by runit.

Sounds good

>   2. Begin to package OpenRC with debian new maintainer's guide.

I hope that will make more people happy, we definitely want more audience

>   3. portage-prefix, follow the discussion result with grobian and
>     lu_zero: implement a mechanism to export EPREFIX from within runscript.sh

Good!

Looking forward to see the results =)

lu


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-24  8:58 [gentoo-soc] report 7.16-7.23: improving OpenRC heroxbd
2012-08-07  4:53 ` [gentoo-soc] report 7.24-8.7: " heroxbd
2012-08-07  9:16   ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-08 23:24     ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.8: " heroxbd
2012-08-09  6:05       ` Luca Barbato [this message]
2012-08-10  2:56         ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.9: " heroxbd
2012-08-10  8:51           ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-11  0:31             ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.10: " heroxbd
2012-08-11 23:50               ` [gentoo-soc] report 8.11: " heroxbd
2012-08-13  8:33                 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-15 15:14                   ` [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 heroxbd
2012-08-15 21:47                     ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-16  8:38                       ` heroxbd
2012-08-16 11:41                         ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-17  5:39                           ` heroxbd
2012-08-17  7:29                             ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-17 11:56                               ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-20  3:04                                 ` heroxbd
2012-08-20  8:16                                   ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 10:25                                     ` Fabian Groffen
2012-08-20 16:32                                       ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 18:25                                         ` Fabian Groffen
2012-08-20 10:47                                     ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-20 16:34                                       ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 18:12                                         ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-20 18:28                                           ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-20 16:15                                   ` EBo
2012-08-21 14:07                         ` heroxbd
2012-08-21 15:55                           ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-22  2:04                             ` heroxbd
2012-08-22  7:35                               ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-27 10:46                                 ` Patrick Lauer
2012-08-27 12:37                                   ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-27 13:29                                   ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-27 14:10                                     ` Rich Freeman
2012-08-27 14:35                                       ` Luca Barbato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50235319.5000504@gentoo.org \
    --to=lu_zero@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox