From: Michael Seifert <michael.seifert@gmx.net>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] GSoC - Package statistics
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:27:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8A65BD.6010903@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110323134937.GB22830@comet.mayo.edu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.03.2011 14:49, schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> On 23:30 Tue 22 Mar , Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 01:09 +0100, Michael Seifert wrote:
>>> I agree that a web-based querying tool/platform would be important.
>
> I don't think it's critical to the project at all, for it to be useful
> to Gentoo developers. As a dev myself, I typically avoid things that
> require me to go to websites because it just takes longer. I use CLI
> interfaces to bugzilla, I read mailing lists and use text editors in a
> terminal, etc.
>
> I'd like a simple CLI tool that just goes and grabs me the info about a
> given package, or shows me overall rankings for certain sets of packages
> (depending on specified queries). Perhaps a web-service (using REST or
> SOAP) would be more interesting to implement than an actual UI. Then
> anyone could tack a web-based UI on later.
>
> Sure, a webapp might be nice for users, and perhaps for a few devs, but
> you could definitely propose a complete project without it.
>
A web-service without UI sounds like good compromise to me :)
What I find a nice idea is that package maintainers can query users to
get feedback, as Brian suggested. However the extent of how much the
users are bothered should be measured carefully. Nobody wants annoying
popups to ask repeatedly about things you don't care much.
Does anyone think that some advanced statistics are appreciated, for
example calculating package trends or determining correlations?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2KZb0ACgkQnzX+Jf4GTUwRhgCguYv47SBBA25aKlIhLCaqnGsa
kwUAn05SZmsWBD9SdtXF8Y9P9R49BGAE
=KOdk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 23:39 [gentoo-soc] GSoC - Package statistics Michael Seifert
2011-03-22 0:51 ` Brian Dolbec
2011-03-22 3:22 ` chris
2011-03-22 4:59 ` Brian Dolbec
2011-03-23 0:09 ` Michael Seifert
2011-03-23 6:30 ` Brian Dolbec
2011-03-23 8:48 ` Michael Seifert
2011-03-23 13:49 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-03-23 21:27 ` Michael Seifert [this message]
2011-03-23 22:54 ` Brian Dolbec
2011-03-24 1:35 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D8A65BD.6010903@gmx.net \
--to=michael.seifert@gmx.net \
--cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox