From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-soc+bounces-1073-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1ObcLB-000135-91
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:40:17 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42B59E0AEC;
	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19546E0AEC
	for <gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226])
	by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5421B290C4
	for <gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:40:13 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4C47232F.1050803@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:41:19 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-soc+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-soc+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-soc+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-soc.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update
References: <4C447338.7090401@gmail.com> <4C457BAA.4090708@gentoo.org> <20100720104027.GI6016@gentoo.org> <4C45BABE.4040809@gmail.com> <4C46CD36.2070403@gentoo.org> <4C46D115.4000007@gentoo.org> <4C471954.1090505@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C471954.1090505@gentoo.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigA5FF96A8146F8B5668FC4B9C"
X-Archives-Salt: e1f886ad-e3e5-4e87-849c-a0897f736949
X-Archives-Hash: 0a8b3228301bccad1135ddac813620af

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigA5FF96A8146F8B5668FC4B9C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07/21/2010 06:59 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:

>=20
> Anyway it's not so related to the project at hand. Still I wonder why
> not using a quick language (e.g. ruby, python) for this project if the
> aim is to have a prototype. C and C++ are useful if you plan to optimiz=
e
> a lot.
>=20

Anltr has two mature backends as far as I know: C and Java. My guess is
that most of the people wouldn't approve the latter.

Regards,
Petteri


--------------enigA5FF96A8146F8B5668FC4B9C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=0rdZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigA5FF96A8146F8B5668FC4B9C--