public inbox for gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mu Qiao <qiaomuf@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Progress of NetworkManager Plug-in 2010.05.20
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:17:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C27F844.8010105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006261821.07306.Nikoli@lavabit.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2054 bytes --]

On 06/26/2010 10:21 PM, Nikoli wrote:
> В сообщении от 26 июня 2010 17:25:09 автор Mu Qiao написал:
>> Well, you're right. I've go through the links you listed and I agree
>> that pptp could be implemented. But as far as I know, NM supports vpnc,
>> openvpn and pptp by an unified way. I think it would be confusing to
>> users if we only supported one of them. Think about it, it's a little
>> mess(different configuration files, don't know which one is supported,
>> etc.). Meanwhile, currently it is very easy to make a VPN connection. I
>> don't see a strong need to support it by our plug-in especially when it
>> may involve the mess.
>>
>> So in my opinion, If we could support vpnc, openvpn and pptp, it's worth
>> implementing. Certainly, if you have better idea, please tell me :-).
> 
> Ideally plugin should work so:
> 1) install gentoo
> 2) install NM+plugin
> 3) configure networks
> 4) after rebooting all network connections work fine even if NM failed to start 
> or is completely removed.
> 
> Gentoo supports vpnc and openvpn with /etc/conf.d/net and /etc/init.d/vpnc ( 
> /etc/init.d/openvpn ) + /etc/vpnc/ (/etc/openvpn/), so you can add support for 
> them:
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/vpnc-howto.xml
> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/OpenVPN
> 
> But this may require much work and in worst case may cause some code 
> duplication.

Yes, that's right. This plug-in has already involved several unplanned
configuration files such as dhcpcd. It will become too complicated if we
deal with too many files. But if it's worth implementing, I'll still do
it. So I'll think about it after midterm evaluation.

> Seems plugin also does not support GPRS (EDGE), do you plan to add it? 

I'm not sure whether I can do it since I think GPRS is supported in a
totally different way. As far as I know, the plug-in can not handle
this. This is where the modem manager kicks in.

-- 
Cheers,
Mu Qiao
GnuPG fingerprint: 92B1 B0C4 8D14 F8C4 EFA5 3ACC 30B3 0DE4 17B1 57E9


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 554 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2010-06-28  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-20  1:22 [gentoo-soc] Progress of NetworkManager Plug-in 2010.05.20 Mu Qiao
2010-05-20 11:59 ` Антонов Николай
2010-05-20 12:03   ` Arun Raghavan
2010-05-20 12:33   ` Mu Qiao
2010-06-25 13:08     ` Nikoli
2010-06-26  4:37       ` Mu Qiao
2010-06-26 12:01         ` Nikoli
2010-06-26 13:25           ` Mu Qiao
2010-06-26 14:21             ` Nikoli
2010-06-28  1:17               ` Mu Qiao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C27F844.8010105@gmail.com \
    --to=qiaomuf@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox