From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NwfYn-0008C3-Q5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:49:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDD9AE08A5; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 7of9.are-b.org (130-13-ftth.onsnetstudenten.nl [145.120.13.130]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91985E08A5 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.2.0.13] (237-13-ftth.onsnetstudenten.nl [145.120.13.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: oliver) by 7of9.are-b.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27E6F39D for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:49:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BB2393A.30609@schinagl.nl> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:47:38 +0200 From: Oliver Schinagl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100324 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Upstart Proposal References: <4BB21E86.30107@schinagl.nl> <4BB2315B.70406@gentoo.org> <4BB23618.9000503@schinagl.nl> <4BB2394F.6080004@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB2394F.6080004@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 976fcd9f-63d5-4ab9-aa47-728cfd9cbde0 X-Archives-Hash: 184b38928adf8c93f2a4819b56a384c0 On 03/30/10 19:47, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > On 03/30/2010 08:34 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote: > =20 >> On 03/30/10 19:14, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> =20 >>> On 03/30/2010 06:53 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote: >>> =20 >>> =20 >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> According to http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/userrel/soc/applying.xml = one >>>> should write a proposal and such as here it is! >>>> >>>> =20 >>>> =20 >>> Actually full proposals are not meant to be sent to this mailing list= . >>> That's what the GSoC web application is for after all. We would like >>> people to email this list with new ideas so that they don't waste tim= e >>> writing a full application for something that's never going to get >>> accepted. If you want someone to review your application before >>> submitting it to the web application then you can talk to a potential >>> mentor of your idea. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Petteri >>> >>> =20 >>> =20 >> I tried, but the proposal application only lets me put in 500 words, >> which where far far to little. Hence this way? I also CC-ed the mentor >> for this project so hopefully I'll get a message from him how to furth= er >> go with this. >> >> Oliver >> >> =20 > Are you sure that's also applies for Content and not just for Abstract? > > Regards, > Petteri > > =20 There was no content field, just an 500 word limited abstract, and a 1 liner for 'additional info'.