From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NwbCW-0000s1-79 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:09:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5630EE0D46; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29089E0D46 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.197] (qiv5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.197]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F6202A8FE for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB1F827.8090209@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:09:59 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Gentoo Council App References: <4BB11574.8070005@gmail.com> <4BB1F4A6.8090009@clemens-mayer.de> In-Reply-To: <4BB1F4A6.8090009@clemens-mayer.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig44A87C672ABDBF9996266968" X-Archives-Salt: c7c44110-7cbb-401f-9a09-6e661adea1c4 X-Archives-Hash: 1b780c6a79a4625fde3f1493b4a514e3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig44A87C672ABDBF9996266968 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/30/2010 03:55 PM, Clemens Mayer wrote: > I've just another question concerning this project: >=20 > The current application is using the Hobo-Framework. Does a potential > dev have to continue using this, or could he rewrite the app using > "standard" rails? >=20 Here are the options: 1) Continue on top of hobo 2) Convince me that you will be maintaining it two years from now 3) Convince me why I want to maintain standard rails instead of hobo A successful project will be improved for the years to come so long term maintenance is important. I have done many projects using Hobo so I know there's a learning curve but it's quite nice when you start to master it.= Regards, Petteri --------------enig44A87C672ABDBF9996266968 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLsfgqAAoJEPeUsk245OzwJu0P/i8ihNoepWIIcrBERxxPgsxO Z2xSxXkb6WHj584xAoTrRgp3CJvnI7Zn6MyGVBf8nZ+p+GCop8RY3F1y0327zH2N WXoZs/eXPrGNZxexZHMjPzINbbjKysoWJH52LGgXx68Fkrmjf+p1sn+Ur08Ou4wv 3frpANo5nk2YV5FEWywU/t97mYcwpgPnVnUTC5L8fNAt/4HumdyNlMJpbh5QV+dd VZhXgVR/NC1yd23h50x9M/fSG1P4GBMH6JPUV1N5WVjTgroaYFQ/Hwftp0TkCznk +hz1ivYSBmmJeyp1lR1+cIyjUBffuumQyhF5J0fddcX6D/bdqvCgybcCk4RmVlBT XKzxrolxXGkzhx69IFlBsVqsFhId5p8ZQv1JYBcrv+2M13y+rRJ+LkxYG2Osgrjc lZpRq72oTc4itxo6md601fi1NaXsSuL3m7ALr+kYRKS9naR0pRj8PLjX3ojyHbXD 4pZbVUdMZA3Ww3mQ0UdmbZfOA/HmY8zI/UUoD3RoNJuyh5awMdalN5EPc1g11j3z tJtgj0KCTLrL/WrWzJ0NPTcwb0winqWPZ/JzGpHNbBCJJLPDj881f8qoW/hfqU/D Ja5nD7MTxF8OT8HDHwKzTUOhq6A3gchSx7ODH/2sInqvH3z+lwNx04+feNmd1USv Naf3NrVNNonYIBWd0Xqs =DV4H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig44A87C672ABDBF9996266968--