From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NniTK-0003PH-9C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:06:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAEDBE0771 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 01:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B71E0B79 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 00:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.22.10] (ip68-4-152-120.oc.oc.cox.net [68.4.152.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331721B40A3 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 00:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B91A6F8.8090509@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:51:04 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100215 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Re: Your part on ideas/issues for Google Summer of Code 2010 References: <4B8EF8DA.6080609@gentoo.org> <4B9094B0.2070509@gentoo.org> <4B9126AF.5050009@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B9126AF.5050009@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ac95dabf-5d33-473d-98de-11f9bd1b59c7 X-Archives-Hash: cf6abb303f84ee80ea06018a5749bbad On 03/05/2010 07:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >>> Native Portage Multilib Support? >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145737 >> >> It's already been done: >> >> http://wiki.github.com/sjnewbury/multilib-overlay/ >> >> It seems like all we need to do now is finalize the details and put >> together a migration plan for integrating it into Gentoo. > > Please update the bug accordingly and make sure it doesn't "get lost". I've posted this link on the bug: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6420969ab583adab2c6e29c8955f96e6.xml -- Thanks, Zac