From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnZgv-0000NZ-If for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:43:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA8D1E0B42; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6011E0B42 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179041094.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.41.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CD51B4115 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B9126AF.5050009@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:43:43 +0100 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Re: Your part on ideas/issues for Google Summer of Code 2010 References: <4B8EF8DA.6080609@gentoo.org> <4B9094B0.2070509@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B9094B0.2070509@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d7340230-a526-46b5-94a4-dd6bf38d71b0 X-Archives-Hash: 5c2fdca0024268724657b2a9fc87cc13 On 03/05/10 06:20, Zac Medico wrote: > On 03/03/2010 04:03 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> @zmedico >> implement a bunch of repoman checks >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repoman > > I'm not sure if that's appropriate for a SOC project because it's > like a bunch of independent small projects that could easily be done > by separate individuals. My idea of a SOC project is something that > absolutely requires the sustained focus of a single individual. It's not a perfect fit, right. Alternatively we could use these repoman check bugs to get more people into the portage boat once we're on Git with it. >> Native Portage Multilib Support? >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145737 > > It's already been done: > > http://wiki.github.com/sjnewbury/multilib-overlay/ > > It seems like all we need to do now is finalize the details and put > together a migration plan for integrating it into Gentoo. Please update the bug accordingly and make sure it doesn't "get lost". Sebastian