From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6b1M-0005YD-Ud for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 04:04:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07557E0529 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D600B1C06B for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (174-25-228-204.rstr.qwest.net [174.25.228.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1A2167254 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:34:08 -0500 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-soc] Pre-submission proposal reviews Message-ID: <20110404033407.GC1699@eee> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b53a5d266304556a0e6c7ce8ee7d5235 --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, A few of you have caught me on IRC and asked me about whether you should=20 have your proposal reviewed before you submit it on the website. First=20 of all, don't worry if you've already submitted because it isn't=20 necessary. However... If there is a prospective mentor for your project, I encourage you to=20 have him or her review it to make sure it's realistic. I'm also=20 available to provide a general review on whether your application will=20 provide enough detail, whether it's planned well, and whether it's clear=20 and convincing to non-experts (which most of the reviewers are). --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Admin, Summer of Code Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.com --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk2ZPC0ACgkQXVaO67S1rtvS8gCfSfrhno3BhB2eOiapl2gtTxIe S0QAn1tnEBDdaGu50s9a6AdyX6cwVm+U =4GQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH--