[gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Brian Harring]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 608 bytes --]

Hello folk-

For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look at 
your proposal, specifically the public comments.

Please note you should be subscribed to your proposal also, but verify 
it- the mentors/reviewers use the public comments to ask for 
clarification/expanding of proposals, or to point out if there was an 
issue with the application where the proposal didn't get pasted.

It's in your interest to answer whatever questions the mentors level, 
so please ensure that you're subscribed and that you've addressed any 
questions.

Thanks, and good luck!
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Mu Qiao]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello folk-
>
> For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look at
> your proposal, specifically the public comments.
>
> Please note you should be subscribed to your proposal also, but verify
> it- the mentors/reviewers use the public comments to ask for
> clarification/expanding of proposals, or to point out if there was an
> issue with the application where the proposal didn't get pasted.
>
> It's in your interest to answer whatever questions the mentors level,
> so please ensure that you're subscribed and that you've addressed any
> questions.
>
> Thanks, and good luck!
> ~harring
>

Thank you for your note. It's really should be a default option that
the proposal is subscribed by the submitter.
Anyway, I guess most of us have paid much attention so that the
comments should not be missed :)

-- 
Best wishes,
Mu Qiao

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Petteri Räty]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1172 bytes --]

On 04/12/2010 12:33 PM, Mu Qiao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello folk-
>>
>> For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look at
>> your proposal, specifically the public comments.
>>
>> Please note you should be subscribed to your proposal also, but verify
>> it- the mentors/reviewers use the public comments to ask for
>> clarification/expanding of proposals, or to point out if there was an
>> issue with the application where the proposal didn't get pasted.
>>
>> It's in your interest to answer whatever questions the mentors level,
>> so please ensure that you're subscribed and that you've addressed any
>> questions.
>>
>> Thanks, and good luck!
>> ~harring
>>
> 
> Thank you for your note. It's really should be a default option that
> the proposal is subscribed by the submitter.
> Anyway, I guess most of us have paid much attention so that the
> comments should not be missed :)
> 

If you think it should be on by default go to:
http://code.google.com/p/soc/issues/detail?id=748
There you can vote for having it on by default.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Nirbheek Chauhan]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04/12/2010 12:33 PM, Mu Qiao wrote:
>> Thank you for your note. It's really should be a default option that
>> the proposal is subscribed by the submitter.
>> Anyway, I guess most of us have paid much attention so that the
>> comments should not be missed :)
>>
>
> If you think it should be on by default go to:
> http://code.google.com/p/soc/issues/detail?id=748
> There you can vote for having it on by default.
>

I think you mean http://code.google.com/p/soc/issues/detail?id=768

748 is about differentiating b/w a zero score and no score.

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Petteri Räty]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 761 bytes --]

On 04/12/2010 07:22 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 04/12/2010 12:33 PM, Mu Qiao wrote:
>>> Thank you for your note. It's really should be a default option that
>>> the proposal is subscribed by the submitter.
>>> Anyway, I guess most of us have paid much attention so that the
>>> comments should not be missed :)
>>>
>>
>> If you think it should be on by default go to:
>> http://code.google.com/p/soc/issues/detail?id=748
>> There you can vote for having it on by default.
>>
> 
> I think you mean http://code.google.com/p/soc/issues/detail?id=768
> 
> 748 is about differentiating b/w a zero score and no score.
> 

Wrong link yes.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Rahul Jain]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 884 bytes --]

On Monday 12 April 2010 09:27:07 Brian Harring wrote:
> Hello folk-
> 
> For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look at
> your proposal, specifically the public comments.
> 
> Please note you should be subscribed to your proposal also, but verify
> it- the mentors/reviewers use the public comments to ask for
> clarification/expanding of proposals, or to point out if there was an
> issue with the application where the proposal didn't get pasted.
> 
> It's in your interest to answer whatever questions the mentors level,
> so please ensure that you're subscribed and that you've addressed any
> questions.
> 
> Thanks, and good luck!
> ~harring

And what about students who have no comments on the proposal yet? Does only 
the mentor comment on the proposal?

Regards
Rahul Jain
-- 
M.Sc. Computer Science
ETH Zürich
Switzerland

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Arun Raghavan]

On 15 April 2010 19:41, Rahul Jain <rahul@schmizz.net> wrote:
[...]
> And what about students who have no comments on the proposal yet? Does only
> the mentor comment on the proposal?

No, all mentors review all projects and post comments/feedback if they have any.

Cheers,
-- 
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Donnie Berkholz]

On 16:11 Thu 15 Apr     , Rahul Jain wrote:
> On Monday 12 April 2010 09:27:07 Brian Harring wrote:
> > For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look 
> > at your proposal, specifically the public comments.
> > 
> And what about students who have no comments on the proposal yet? Does 
> only the mentor comment on the proposal?

Rahul,

Everyone does read the proposal, but the lack of public comments doesn't 
mean anything good or bad. No public comments only means that nobody 
who's read it has had any questions. We're still discussing the proposal 
privately among the mentors and evaluating it.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Admin, Summer of Code
Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

Re: [gentoo-soc] candidates please check your comments

[Rahul Jain]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 867 bytes --]

On Thursday 15 April 2010 16:24:09 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:11 Thu 15 Apr     , Rahul Jain wrote:
> > On Monday 12 April 2010 09:27:07 Brian Harring wrote:
> > > For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look
> > > at your proposal, specifically the public comments.
> > 
> > And what about students who have no comments on the proposal yet? Does
> > only the mentor comment on the proposal?
> 
> Rahul,
> 
> Everyone does read the proposal, but the lack of public comments doesn't
> mean anything good or bad. No public comments only means that nobody
> who's read it has had any questions. We're still discussing the proposal
> privately among the mentors and evaluating it.

Hi,

Thanks for the replies Arun and Donnie. Much appreciated. :)

Regards
Rahul Jain
-- 
M.Sc. Computer Science
ETH Zürich
Switzerland

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]