From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E3IeX-00017N-VF
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:23:46 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BJKoin026918;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:20:50 GMT
Received: from mail.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BJKnom005062
	for <gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:20:49 GMT
Received: (qmail 2573 invoked by uid 0); 11 Aug 2005 19:21:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ida.bway.net) (216.220.96.4)
  by smtp.bway.net with (EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 Aug 2005 19:21:43 -0000
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: "A. Khattri" <ajai@bway.net>
To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Comments on IMAP Server (cyrus/courier/dovecot)
In-Reply-To: <42FB9CB2.6000909@buanzo.com.ar>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.58.0508111517101.3456@ida.bway.net>
References: <1123731973.5878.30.camel@neuromancer.home.net>
 <200508111641.37118.pookey@pookey.co.uk> <Pine.BSO.4.58.0508111157260.3456@ida.bway.net>
 <200508111718.15744.pookey@pookey.co.uk> <Pine.BSO.4.58.0508111226240.3456@ida.bway.net>
 <42FB9CB2.6000909@buanzo.com.ar>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-server+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-server+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-server+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-server.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Archives-Salt: edc83d5e-c808-44de-b9de-e050304dddac
X-Archives-Hash: bb3b702507b71baa02fc9fa2cf0cee15

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:

> On a personal note, this has been a really nice thread. I got to know about vexim on it, and had a
> chance to think about why I personally dislike CURRENT Cyrus (Open Source is just like that... you
> have to keep trying again and again, and catch up with the changelog!).

That's true. Last time I played with Cyrus I seem to remember an issue
with the IMAP namespace and SASL.

In our current setup, you can have infinitely nested folders any way you
like in IMAP.


-- 

-- 
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list