From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SB65o-0004el-Kh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:07:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41200E09CC for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB94AE089E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenq2 with SMTP id q2so3229910yen.40 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:36:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=VIS2FTlIjJZeUZV1xUOUv6xoEv0I2CMUdfXDdS2+wbE=; b=XjogOyxlL3rMQVtlTaiMTLIBRV+dORBDFHaQ/bfslrRvz/1+yXyrKgzoff8XcoXZjr Zy5xEV3Tlgu6adtx93TOOMbr28Dnsfmb2oH7l+7UwiT9Oo0UFwTNZkQwArm59usmNhxe 3qZLJXkdFzjTOR+fEOmeyE56G6T7wCrG/p9XV3vqwVEG3q6/7F0VD9FiGRbGkSuRQusF JUb08uZqTfa789zLhtB7VBl0JBWi69v2Bh9qADbkspYI0zCvnMPUezpLmUNKJPENmhKS FYNBAhDhLLGGaRS0c7gXPiJdmxY8GtGP86d0GRrjana+SnQSGhvk8ieVUri66cHR+lVe yDDg== Received: by 10.60.3.6 with SMTP id 6mr3950031oey.35.1332509763162; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.45.97 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:35:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F670C97.1080602@loginet.hu> <4F699DC3.6030805@loginet.hu> From: Drew Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:35:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] udev or mdev? To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 29136969-2855-421b-878b-6a897398b91e X-Archives-Hash: 655dd30647a3290f6cc744fe51c23961 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Daniel Reidy wrote: > people actually need an initramfs? > > my kernel has only what it needs, and nothing it doesn't. +1 Only time I used initramfs was on a desktop and that was while testing a quirky lvm/raid setup that wouldn't boot without mdadm doing some assembly *before* the main root filesystem became available. That was never production quality though and all my servers run either off a HW RAID card or boot from a SAN. -- Drew "Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood." --Marie Curie "This started out as a hobby and spun horribly out of control." -Unknown