From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Xen Dom0 using kernel 3.0
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:18:48 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGWx+i-cFpunZ1o0zqe1ZmLEXuJz7r7FVrc6PUZdGYk-8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36488487.HyIKE3pFTv@eve>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:29, Joost Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, August 14, 2011 07:20:18 PM Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>> Rgds,
>>
>> On 2011-08-14, Joost Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org> wrote:
>> > On Saturday, August 13, 2011 04:15:44 PM Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> >> So, anyone have any experience using kernel 3.0 as Xen Dom0?
>> >
>> > Not yet, it is in the todo-list though.
>> > Just waiting for a period where I can do the upgrade and afford a
>> > down-time with restoring backups if things go wrong.
>> >
>> >> (I have some idea of starting a Gentoo-variant-based Xen platform in
>> >> the vein of XCP/XenServer)
>> >
>> > What exactly are you thinking of implementing?
>> >
>
>> (Sorry for top-posting. Gmail Java mobile client sucks.)
>
> (Fixed this for you)
>
>> I was thinking of something similar to XCP ... but with Gentoo as the
>> Dom0. I'll call it GeDZux (Gentoo Domain Zero Linux) :P
>
> A different name would be prefered by myself, not got an idea yet though.
>
No worry. I know it sounds too... wishy-washy/unserious.
Had originally wanted to call it "Xentoo", but some might mistake it
for Xen2, or worse Xen 2.0.
Ah well... We'll think of something later :-)
>> The problem would be how to 'streamline' the installation of a
>> GeDZux-based Xen Platform. The SysAdmin already has lots of things to
>> think about; he/she doesn't need to think (too much) about which USE
>> flags to use, what CFLAGS to put in, which packages to emerge
>> *initially*, etc.
>
> I agree, tools to quickly generate/close new domUs based on templates would
> help as well. With different options for where the disks are stored:
> - File
> - LVM
> - physical partitions
>
By domU here, do you mean Gentoo domU's or general domU's?
Citrix XenServer's 'template' feature comes to mind...
>> That is, how to provide sensible defaults yet not irreversibly
>> removing Gentoo's freedom. So, GeDZux will be a Gentoo variant, a
>> 'submetadistro', if you will :P
>
> A profile putting all the necessary tools (xen, kernel, bridge,....) as
> required.
>
Aha! Good idea. Let me learn how to make a profile then.
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-13 8:15 [gentoo-server] Xen Dom0 using kernel 3.0 Pandu Poluan
2011-08-14 10:18 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-08-14 11:20 ` [gentoo-server] " Pandu Poluan
2011-08-14 19:29 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-08-15 6:18 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
2011-08-15 9:08 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-08-15 12:22 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-15 12:47 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-08-15 13:30 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-15 15:54 ` Joost Roeleveld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA2qdGWx+i-cFpunZ1o0zqe1ZmLEXuJz7r7FVrc6PUZdGYk-8A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox