From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnUPb-0007bG-1N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:05:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93C8CE080C for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magrathea.aachalon.de (magrathea.aachalon.de [81.24.35.71]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7093DE0F71 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by magrathea.aachalon.de (Postfix, from userid 72) id 438274077D; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:59:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from 80.87.162.65 (SquirrelMail authenticated user shiva) by aachalon.de with HTTP; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:59:52 +0100 Message-ID: <7ee216e79d887ee8dc9e74b2e6255e1d.squirrel@aachalon.de> In-Reply-To: <1267771348.4504.18.camel@Ur> References: <1267771348.4504.18.camel@Ur> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:59:52 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Slow nameresolution with bind From: "Christian Bricart" To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: eef5c235-0802-47fd-92eb-2359ccb930de X-Archives-Hash: e406f0464ed31e3f896ef7b04744b054 Alexander Zimmerling wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am sitting here with my new gentoo server. At the moment I struggle > with bind. The problem is known, but I cannot solve it without help. > [..] have you tried to point upstream resolving to your provider's nameservers rather than always asking the root-nameservers..? try adding: .. forwarders { 8.8.8.8; 8.8.4.4; }; .. to the "options { ..}"-block in your /etc/bind/named.conf - which will then ask the Google-DNS cluster for unknown/uncached RR. You may also specify your provider's DNS IPs there to have an even shorte= r round-trip for lookups. > P.S.: I've found a similar "bug" in bugzilla > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D269202) but w/o resolution. i doubt that your problem is IPv6 related. Christian