From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hc1Fc-00064P-VC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:30:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3CFSVLG024177; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:28:31 GMT Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3CFNKb5014943 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:23:21 GMT Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so481340pyi for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:23:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lSlyfqMgyJxupRK85ssUHXQVqs9ayL7Aq3MCdAhTHQbt3bUA4KV4bjwjMDIFp2CELANbQ/pQ+n4JWGTOTktvN3JspqBWrE03vB4wPR4BeOIQwm6JUFhwSaY+77Jlci+r4hTGtpC5JavG9845FRc4FcNmXoCXKy8BBi02NqUh2U4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BvTjfzNG3hDVvlQSctA/Bm13SLmUDETRIYkAUwBzZ2/pfEWNoSYirPLIh4IZx3tHSN2md2+D4Z0aQYvpdn5fvoKj1EVamGXwL2pfBk5hS7Ama61ShsWzlEaniUNis33qmqqKmKdveXFLV2Sof1xETGvcZB47q5iM/E3MvlxL1r0= Received: by 10.65.119.14 with SMTP id w14mr4115717qbm.1176391400561; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.222.2 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7d20977a0704120823n591ecc7cifabcdcecf69fe784@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:23:19 -0700 From: Korthrun To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Gigabit cards In-Reply-To: <461D366F.7070609@hyperreal.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1176226174.4564.28.camel@localhost> <461D2922.20606@smash-net.org> <461D366F.7070609@hyperreal.org> X-Archives-Salt: cf636302-5784-4326-bf75-2cefe4e8ba9f X-Archives-Hash: 8238f8f489d1c41ef696491cc6c792f9 On 4/11/07, Mark Rudholm wrote: > Norman Rie=DF wrote: > > Wendall Cada schrieb: > >> I'm looking for recommendations for the best price versus quality > >> gigabit ethernet cards. Particularly interested in stability as they > >> will be used in a production mail server and production web server. > >> > >> Wendall > >> > >> > > Definitely Intel. > > I would second (third? fourth?) that recommendation. > I'm a sysadmin at a really big Internet company, and > have dealt with lots of cards. Intels are consistently > the least likely to cause headaches. > -- > gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list > > Just want to second this. The e1000 driver is pretty solid, and very stable. I've never really had an issue with it. --=20 () The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email, /\ vCards, and proprietary formats. -- gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list