From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3JK4swu030213
	for <gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:04:55 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2207593wra
        for <gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=VoeQRn8XYCUbWFUvm/7AxNsbvV9Y69CkcPg4hIyqB4XZDlyWptXeofqTXcukcGuQJzSLHoPCyw9Vtmoby4jFpLdk3DQ9mtHwBoShczn8ol84JyOCWoCg1Jc6i8ciQTkByqPyZJmiwYbz985myvZyhMeu/1MSvB4Og8aDZ9d88Ds=
Received: by 10.54.11.38 with SMTP id 38mr1254267wrk;
        Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.43.18 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <79c4d9ee05041913052723d1b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:05:03 -0400
From: Renzo Rosales <rrosales@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] anybody using exact for pop before smtp(with exim specifically)?
In-Reply-To: <4261B305.8040805@comcast.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-server+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-server+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-server+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-server.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4261B305.8040805@comcast.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j3JK4swu030213
X-Archives-Salt: 10777293-beff-4509-bce8-be5a7d308b03
X-Archives-Hash: 943936d7da0e7fa38d3907410f6d869b

Why have \[(.*)\] when (.*) would do the same since . would match any
single character. Did you end up finding a solution?

-- 
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list