* [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin
@ 2009-04-06 23:50 Wendall Cada
2009-04-07 0:50 ` David
2009-04-07 12:07 ` Kerin Millar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wendall Cada @ 2009-04-06 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
I run several production servers on Hardened Gentoo, and have a concern.
The perl team has been awesome. I really love that packages are fairly
fresh compared to what is in cpan. However, there is one very important
package that's been ignored for far too long: SpamAssassin
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177144
Why has it been waiting for a mips keyword for almost two years? No
reply from mips. Pinging the bug has no effect, as seen with comments
#5-#8. Is the package abandoned? Is there some political issue with
Gentoo that keeps abandoned packages from being reassigned? I would love
to offer my help, but lately those offers have been flat rejected by
Gentoo devs. I guess my lips don't pucker well enough. I would like to
have this package dealt with. There are some important bug fixes in
newer releases.
Wendall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin
2009-04-06 23:50 [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin Wendall Cada
@ 2009-04-07 0:50 ` David
2009-04-07 12:07 ` Kerin Millar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David @ 2009-04-07 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Wendall Cada wrote:
> I run several production servers on Hardened Gentoo, and have a concern.
>
> The perl team has been awesome. I really love that packages are fairly
> fresh compared to what is in cpan. However, there is one very important
> package that's been ignored for far too long: SpamAssassin
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177144
>
> Why has it been waiting for a mips keyword for almost two years? No
> reply from mips. Pinging the bug has no effect, as seen with comments
> #5-#8. Is the package abandoned? Is there some political issue with
> Gentoo that keeps abandoned packages from being reassigned? I would love
> to offer my help, but lately those offers have been flat rejected by
> Gentoo devs. I guess my lips don't pucker well enough. I would like to
> have this package dealt with. There are some important bug fixes in
> newer releases.
>
> Wendall
>
>
>
Did you try #gentoo-perl
--
Powered by Gentoo GNU/Linux
http://linuxcrazy.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin
2009-04-06 23:50 [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin Wendall Cada
2009-04-07 0:50 ` David
@ 2009-04-07 12:07 ` Kerin Millar
2009-04-07 15:46 ` Wendall Cada
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kerin Millar @ 2009-04-07 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
2009/4/7 Wendall Cada <wendallc@83864.com>:
> I run several production servers on Hardened Gentoo, and have a concern.
>
> The perl team has been awesome. I really love that packages are fairly
> fresh compared to what is in cpan. However, there is one very important
> package that's been ignored for far too long: SpamAssassin
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177144
>
> Why has it been waiting for a mips keyword for almost two years? No
> reply from mips. Pinging the bug has no effect, as seen with comments
> #5-#8. Is the package abandoned? Is there some political issue with
> Gentoo that keeps abandoned packages from being reassigned? I would love
> to offer my help, but lately those offers have been flat rejected by
> Gentoo devs. I guess my lips don't pucker well enough. I would like to
> have this package dealt with. There are some important bug fixes in
> newer releases.
I can appreciate your frustation. At this point, maybe you should try
bringing it to the attention of the QA team (qa@gentoo.org)? Resolving
this situation would presumably be in line with their first stated
goal, which is to "keep the tree in a state which benefits all of our
users and developers alike".
Another tactic would be to befriend a developer who has a vested
interest in the continued fitness of the package (i.e. is known to be
a user) and to ask for their assistance in moving things forwards.
Some developers are rather more receptive to contributions from users
than others, and you may chance upon one.
Cheers,
--Kerin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin
2009-04-07 12:07 ` Kerin Millar
@ 2009-04-07 15:46 ` Wendall Cada
2009-04-07 16:21 ` [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin Torsten Veller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wendall Cada @ 2009-04-07 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Thanks Kerin. Sorry to show my frustration. Just my feeling toward parts
of the Gentoo project lately. I will ping QA about this, and try to find
a perl dev who might look at the package.
This package is pretty stable. There are just some important bug fixes
in newer releases that would be nice to have stabilized.
Wendall
Kerin Millar wrote:
> 2009/4/7 Wendall Cada <wendallc@83864.com>:
>
>> I run several production servers on Hardened Gentoo, and have a concern.
>>
>> The perl team has been awesome. I really love that packages are fairly
>> fresh compared to what is in cpan. However, there is one very important
>> package that's been ignored for far too long: SpamAssassin
>>
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177144
>>
>> Why has it been waiting for a mips keyword for almost two years? No
>> reply from mips. Pinging the bug has no effect, as seen with comments
>> #5-#8. Is the package abandoned? Is there some political issue with
>> Gentoo that keeps abandoned packages from being reassigned? I would love
>> to offer my help, but lately those offers have been flat rejected by
>> Gentoo devs. I guess my lips don't pucker well enough. I would like to
>> have this package dealt with. There are some important bug fixes in
>> newer releases.
>>
>
> I can appreciate your frustation. At this point, maybe you should try
> bringing it to the attention of the QA team (qa@gentoo.org)? Resolving
> this situation would presumably be in line with their first stated
> goal, which is to "keep the tree in a state which benefits all of our
> users and developers alike".
>
> Another tactic would be to befriend a developer who has a vested
> interest in the continued fitness of the package (i.e. is known to be
> a user) and to ask for their assistance in moving things forwards.
> Some developers are rather more receptive to contributions from users
> than others, and you may chance upon one.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kerin
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-server] Spamassassin
@ 2006-09-20 10:26 Suranga Kasthuriarachchi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Suranga Kasthuriarachchi @ 2006-09-20 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 319 bytes --]
Dear All,
I have installed the spamassassin, clamav and then qmailscanner.
qmailscanner working properly. but spamassassin is not working.
the content of the qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt showing only like bellow,
clamdscan: 0.88.4/1901. perlscan: 1.25st.
Please help me on this matter.
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 351 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <42335222.20309@munat.com>]
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-07 16:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-06 23:50 [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin Wendall Cada
2009-04-07 0:50 ` David
2009-04-07 12:07 ` Kerin Millar
2009-04-07 15:46 ` Wendall Cada
2009-04-07 16:21 ` [gentoo-server] SpamAssassin Torsten Veller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-20 10:26 [gentoo-server] Spamassassin Suranga Kasthuriarachchi
[not found] <42335222.20309@munat.com>
[not found] ` <79c4d9ee05031214513f05d72b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4234B431.1090403@munat.com>
[not found] ` <1110775838.13077.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2005-03-16 5:36 ` [gentoo-server] spamassassin Lance Lassetter
[not found] ` <1110689723.10448.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <42342D94.1090908@gmx.ch>
2005-03-27 4:35 ` D. Wokan
2005-03-27 5:59 ` Lance Lassetter
2005-03-27 7:32 ` Ben Munat
2005-03-27 9:32 ` peter.gantner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox