* [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
@ 2006-08-24 16:18 Jared Klett
2006-08-24 17:20 ` Karl Hiramoto
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jared Klett @ 2006-08-24 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
hello Gentoo server folks,
I have a 2U server with a 3ware 9500-12MI controller. there are two
80 GB drives in RAID-1 which servers as the boot device, and ten 400
GB drives in RAID-5 which I want to have mounted as a single volume
at /data.
if I start fresh and create the filesystem after the system has
booted, and mount it, all is well. however, when I reboot the system,
the filesystem won't be mounted and I'll get an error.
to start, I used GNU parted to partition the device, which is at /
dev/sdb. here's a transcript of the session:
Using /dev/sdb
(parted) mklabel
New disk label type? gpt
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
Disk label type: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
(parted) mkpart
Partition type? [primary]?
File system type? [ext2]? reiserfs
Start? 0.0
End? 3600G
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
Disk label type: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 17kB 3600GB 3600GB
(parted) quit
I then do a plain:
root ~ # mkreiserfs /dev/sdb1
mkreiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
Guessing about desired format.. Kernel 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 is running.
Format 3.6 with standard journal
Count of blocks on the device: 878881520
Number of blocks consumed by mkreiserfs formatting process: 35033
Blocksize: 4096
Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
Journal Size 8193 blocks (first block 18)
Journal Max transaction length 1024
inode generation number: 0
UUID: 80864192-b2b1-4f20-ab16-a1242e5cfa1b
ATTENTION: YOU SHOULD REBOOT AFTER FDISK!
ALL DATA WILL BE LOST ON '/dev/sdb1'!
Continue (y/n):y
Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100%
Syncing..ok
root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
root ~ # df -h
[ ... snip ... ]
/dev/sdb1 3.3T 33M 3.3T 1% /data
and all is well.
however, when I update /etc/fstab and reboot the machine, the kernel
loads and mounts the reiserfs filesystems on the boot volume, but
then I get:
reiserfs_open: the reiserfs superblock cannot be found /dev/sdb1.
Failed to open the filesystem.
here's a screenshot of the console:
http://www.project55.net/noloveatboot.png
I hit Control-D and allow the system to finish booting. then I
attempted this:
root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
root ~ # mount -t reiserfs /dev/sdb1 /data
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
root ~ # dmesg | tail
[ ... snip ...]
FAT: bogus number of reserved sectors
VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdb1.
ReiserFS: sdb1: warning: sh-2021: reiserfs_fill_super: can not find
reiserfs on sdb1
this message makes me a bit suspicious. I've tried creating the
reiserfs filesystem from inside parted using mkfs, but I just get
this, in spite of having reiserfsprogs emerged before I emerged parted:
No Implementation: Support for creating reiserfs file systems is not
implemented yet.
I'm running kernel version 2.6.17-gentoo-r4, with the following
enabled:
Block layer --->
[*] Support for Large Block Devices
Partition Types --->
[*] Advanced partition selection
...
[*] EFI GUID Partition support
just for complete information overload, here is the status of the
RAID unit as reported by the 3ware controller:
Status: OK
Capacity: 3.27 TB
Type: RAID 5
Stripe: 256kB
any insights would be most welcome!
cheers,
- Jared
--
Move 'sig'. For great justice.
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 16:18 [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards Jared Klett
@ 2006-08-24 17:20 ` Karl Hiramoto
2006-08-24 18:19 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 18:48 ` Robert Welz
2006-08-24 20:35 ` [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 " Jared Klett
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Karl Hiramoto @ 2006-08-24 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Did you reboot after creating the partition?
Perhaps try fdisk instead of parted?
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 17:20 ` Karl Hiramoto
@ 2006-08-24 18:19 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 19:17 ` Jesse, Rich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jared Klett @ 2006-08-24 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Karl Hiramoto wrote:
> Did you reboot after creating the partition?
yes... even if I don't mount the partition, it's unusable after a
reboot, ala:
root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> Perhaps try fdisk instead of parted?
unfortunately, fdisk doesn't support devices larger than 2 TB.
cheers,
- Jared
--
No, no, no, don't tug on that. You never know what it might be
attached to.
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 16:18 [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards Jared Klett
2006-08-24 17:20 ` Karl Hiramoto
@ 2006-08-24 18:48 ` Robert Welz
2006-08-24 19:18 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 20:35 ` [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 " Jared Klett
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Welz @ 2006-08-24 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Jared Klett wrote:
> Partition type? [primary]?
> File system type? [ext2]? reiserfs
> Start? 0.0
> End? 3600G
> (parted) print
> Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
> Disk label type: gpt
> Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
> 1 17kB 3600GB 3600GB
> (parted) quit
Hi.
I think the "file system" parameter is missing. IMHO it must be 83 or
"Linux".
There are rumors for Reiserfs not as reliable as it should be, maybe you
should consider ext3 journaled, especially since you have such a big
volume, so an eventual recovery is much faster.
But I don't want to start a flame war; thats what I've heard at "Linux
Mailserver Conference" a while ago.
BTW: Are jou running an UPS with your 3ware controller? I've just
fiddled out how not to corrupt my HDs with the 3ware Inc
7xxx/8xxx-series PATA/RAID controller when the nut-ups software shuts
down on power failure.
Robert
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 18:19 ` Jared Klett
@ 2006-08-24 19:17 ` Jesse, Rich
2006-08-24 19:44 ` Jared Klett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jesse, Rich @ 2006-08-24 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
One thing to check is that the kernel mods are either compiled in the
kernel or loaded before mounting the fs.
Probably not it, but I thought I'd check the easiest solution...
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Klett [mailto:jklett@project55.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:19 PM
To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at
boot, and is unusable afterwards
On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Karl Hiramoto wrote:
> Did you reboot after creating the partition?
yes... even if I don't mount the partition, it's unusable after
a
reboot, ala:
root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> Perhaps try fdisk instead of parted?
unfortunately, fdisk doesn't support devices larger than 2 TB.
cheers,
- Jared
--
No, no, no, don't tug on that. You never know what it might be
attached to.
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 18:48 ` Robert Welz
@ 2006-08-24 19:18 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 20:51 ` Robert Welz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jared Klett @ 2006-08-24 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Robert Welz wrote:
> Jared Klett wrote:
>
>> Partition type? [primary]?
>> File system type? [ext2]? reiserfs
>> Start? 0.0
>> End? 3600G
>> (parted) print
>> Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
>> Disk label type: gpt
>> Number Start End Size File system Name
>> Flags
>> 1 17kB 3600GB 3600GB
>> (parted) quit
>
> Hi.
> I think the "file system" parameter is missing.
hi! yes, that isn't correct... it should be "reiserfs".
it doesn't appear until after you run mkreiserfs. example:
Using /dev/sdb
(parted) p
Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
Disk label type: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 17kB 3600GB 3600GB reiserfs
> IMHO it must be 83 or "Linux".
according to the parted manual, it can be one of the following:
ext2
fat16, fat32
hfs, hfs+, hfsx
linux-swap
NTFS
reiserfs
ufs
> BTW: Are jou running an UPS with your 3ware controller? I've just
> fiddled out how not to corrupt my HDs with the 3ware Inc 7xxx/8xxx-
> series PATA/RAID controller when the nut-ups software shuts down on
> power failure.
I don't have a UPS, but the server has a redundant power supply
which is connected to two separate power circuits. so if one goes
out, no big deal. in addition, the 9500-12MI controller has a battery-
backup unit (BBU) installed to preserve the write cache in case of a
power failure.
if you're concerned about power failures when using 3ware cards, I
recommend turning off the write cache, or using a BBU (costs about
$100) if you're using a 95XX-series controller.
unfortunately the 7-8xxx series controllers don't have BBU capability.
cheers,
- Jared
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 19:17 ` Jesse, Rich
@ 2006-08-24 19:44 ` Jared Klett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jared Klett @ 2006-08-24 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Jesse, Rich wrote:
> One thing to check is that the kernel mods are either compiled in the
> kernel or loaded before mounting the fs.
> Probably not it, but I thought I'd check the easiest solution...
hi Rich - good call, but unfortunately I compile everything in when
I build a kernel, as a rule.
- J
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Klett [mailto:jklett@project55.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:19 PM
> To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at
> boot, and is unusable afterwards
>
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Karl Hiramoto wrote:
>
>> Did you reboot after creating the partition?
>
> yes... even if I don't mount the partition, it's unusable after
> a
> reboot, ala:
>
> root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
>
>> Perhaps try fdisk instead of parted?
>
> unfortunately, fdisk doesn't support devices larger than 2 TB.
>
> cheers,
>
> - Jared
>
> --
> No, no, no, don't tug on that. You never know what it might be
> attached to.
>
>
> --
> gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
"Capitalism is the uneven distribution of wealth, and socialism the
even distribution of poverty."
- Winston S. Churchill
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards)
2006-08-24 16:18 [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards Jared Klett
2006-08-24 17:20 ` Karl Hiramoto
2006-08-24 18:48 ` Robert Welz
@ 2006-08-24 20:35 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-25 16:09 ` Jesse, Rich
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jared Klett @ 2006-08-24 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Rich's response got me to thinking - I had seen a reference back
when I was building a similar server. after some creative googling, I
found it:
http://www.coraid.com/support/linux/contrib/chernow/gpt.html
the key note is at the bottom of the page:
"Without this on, strange things happen. For instance, rebooting the
machine caused the file system to no longer be mountable or the GPT
table got corrupted."
aha! exactly my problem! I rebooted the machine and watched the
console carefully, and noted this:
* System.map not found unable to check symbols
hmmmm. after some more googling, I found this discussion:
http://tinyurl.com/o57hm
so I found the solution to making this message go away to be to copy
System.map to /., which is mounted when the message pops up during
the boot process, whereas /boot and /usr are not. then we edit the
block at the end of /sbin/modules-update to be:
if [ -d "`depdir`" -a -f /proc/modules ]
then
if [ -f /System.map ]; then
depmod -a -F /System.map ${KV}
else
ewarn "System.map not found - unable to check symbols"
fi
fi
and viola, the boot process is happy once more.
as an added bonus, this resolves the issue with the filesystem being
usable after a reboot, and mounting at boot time. woohoo!
thanks to all that replied. it always helps to bounce ideas off
others to get the juices flowing.
cheers,
- Jared
On Aug 24, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Jared Klett wrote:
> hello Gentoo server folks,
>
> I have a 2U server with a 3ware 9500-12MI controller. there are
> two 80 GB drives in RAID-1 which servers as the boot device, and
> ten 400 GB drives in RAID-5 which I want to have mounted as a
> single volume at /data.
>
> if I start fresh and create the filesystem after the system has
> booted, and mount it, all is well. however, when I reboot the
> system, the filesystem won't be mounted and I'll get an error.
>
> to start, I used GNU parted to partition the device, which is at /
> dev/sdb. here's a transcript of the session:
>
> Using /dev/sdb
> (parted) mklabel
> New disk label type? gpt
> (parted) print
> Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
> Disk label type: gpt
> Number Start End Size File system Name
> Flags
> (parted) mkpart
> Partition type? [primary]?
> File system type? [ext2]? reiserfs
> Start? 0.0
> End? 3600G
> (parted) print
> Disk geometry for /dev/sdb: 0kB - 3600GB
> Disk label type: gpt
> Number Start End Size File system Name
> Flags
> 1 17kB 3600GB 3600GB
> (parted) quit
>
> I then do a plain:
>
> root ~ # mkreiserfs /dev/sdb1
> mkreiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
> Guessing about desired format.. Kernel 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 is running.
> Format 3.6 with standard journal
> Count of blocks on the device: 878881520
> Number of blocks consumed by mkreiserfs formatting process: 35033
> Blocksize: 4096
> Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
> Journal Size 8193 blocks (first block 18)
> Journal Max transaction length 1024
> inode generation number: 0
> UUID: 80864192-b2b1-4f20-ab16-a1242e5cfa1b
> ATTENTION: YOU SHOULD REBOOT AFTER FDISK!
> ALL DATA WILL BE LOST ON '/dev/sdb1'!
> Continue (y/n):y
> Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100%
> Syncing..ok
>
> root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
> root ~ # df -h
> [ ... snip ... ]
> /dev/sdb1 3.3T 33M 3.3T 1% /data
>
> and all is well.
>
> however, when I update /etc/fstab and reboot the machine, the
> kernel loads and mounts the reiserfs filesystems on the boot
> volume, but then I get:
>
> reiserfs_open: the reiserfs superblock cannot be found /dev/sdb1.
> Failed to open the filesystem.
>
> here's a screenshot of the console:
>
> http://www.project55.net/noloveatboot.png
>
> I hit Control-D and allow the system to finish booting. then I
> attempted this:
>
> root ~ # mount /dev/sdb1 /data
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> root ~ # mount -t reiserfs /dev/sdb1 /data
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1,
> missing codepage or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
> root ~ # dmesg | tail
> [ ... snip ...]
> FAT: bogus number of reserved sectors
> VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdb1.
> ReiserFS: sdb1: warning: sh-2021: reiserfs_fill_super: can not find
> reiserfs on sdb1
>
> this message makes me a bit suspicious. I've tried creating the
> reiserfs filesystem from inside parted using mkfs, but I just get
> this, in spite of having reiserfsprogs emerged before I emerged
> parted:
>
> No Implementation: Support for creating reiserfs file systems is
> not implemented yet.
>
> I'm running kernel version 2.6.17-gentoo-r4, with the following
> enabled:
>
> Block layer --->
> [*] Support for Large Block Devices
> Partition Types --->
> [*] Advanced partition selection
> ...
> [*] EFI GUID Partition support
>
> just for complete information overload, here is the status of the
> RAID unit as reported by the 3ware controller:
>
> Status: OK
> Capacity: 3.27 TB
> Type: RAID 5
> Stripe: 256kB
>
> any insights would be most welcome!
>
> cheers,
>
> - Jared
>
> --
> Move 'sig'. For great justice.
>
> --
> gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
It is very dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards
2006-08-24 19:18 ` Jared Klett
@ 2006-08-24 20:51 ` Robert Welz
2006-08-24 21:14 ` [gentoo-server] 3ware controllers (was: 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards) Jared Klett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Welz @ 2006-08-24 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Jared Klett wrote:
>
>> BTW: Are jou running an UPS with your 3ware controller? I've just
>> fiddled out how not to corrupt my HDs with the 3ware Inc
>> 7xxx/8xxx-series PATA/RAID controller when the nut-ups software shuts
>> down on power failure.
>
> I don't have a UPS, but the server has a redundant power supply
> which is connected to two separate power circuits. so if one goes out,
> no big deal. in addition, the 9500-12MI controller has a battery-backup
> unit (BBU) installed to preserve the write cache in case of a power
> failure.
>
> if you're concerned about power failures when using 3ware cards, I
> recommend turning off the write cache, or using a BBU (costs about $100)
> if you're using a 95XX-series controller.
Yes. First flush at shutdown then immediately following a switch-off of
the cache.
Did you get the webserver management software to run? I couldn't, it
always crashed. But the console client works. Some scripting and polling
every 30 minutes and it sends emails on alerts and failures. But the
3ware webserver would be more convenient, at least a bit I think.
Greetings,
Robert.
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-server] 3ware controllers (was: 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards)
2006-08-24 20:51 ` Robert Welz
@ 2006-08-24 21:14 ` Jared Klett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jared Klett @ 2006-08-24 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
On Aug 24, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Robert Welz wrote:
> Jared Klett wrote:
>
>>> BTW: Are jou running an UPS with your 3ware controller? I've just
>>> fiddled out how not to corrupt my HDs with the 3ware Inc 7xxx/
>>> 8xxx-series PATA/RAID controller when the nut-ups software shuts
>>> down on power failure.
>> I don't have a UPS, but the server has a redundant power
>> supply which is connected to two separate power circuits. so if
>> one goes out, no big deal. in addition, the 9500-12MI controller
>> has a battery-backup unit (BBU) installed to preserve the write
>> cache in case of a power failure.
>> if you're concerned about power failures when using 3ware
>> cards, I recommend turning off the write cache, or using a BBU
>> (costs about $100) if you're using a 95XX-series controller.
> Yes. First flush at shutdown then immediately following a switch-
> off of the cache.
>
> Did you get the webserver management software to run? I couldn't,
> it always crashed. But the console client works. Some scripting and
> polling every 30 minutes and it sends emails on alerts and
> failures. But the 3ware webserver would be more convenient, at
> least a bit I think.
I, too, have had difficulty on older Gentoo systems with a 2.4.x
kernel.
the latest release of 3DM2 (9.3.0.4) seems to have corrected a lot
of issues when run with 7-8xxx controllers. I have a few systems with
8006-2 controllers and one with a 7506-4 that have 3DM2 running
happily. but all those are running 2.6.x kernels... so I'm not sure
if there are still issues with 3DM2 on 2.4.x kernels.
cheers,
- Jared
--
It's yet another in a long series of diversions in an attempt to
avoid responsibility.
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards)
2006-08-24 20:35 ` [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 " Jared Klett
@ 2006-08-25 16:09 ` Jesse, Rich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jesse, Rich @ 2006-08-25 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
GJ! Saving your solution for future reference... :)
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Klett [mailto:jklett@project55.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:36 PM
To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at
boot, and is unusable afterwards)
Rich's response got me to thinking - I had seen a reference back
when I was building a similar server. after some creative googling, I
found it:
http://www.coraid.com/support/linux/contrib/chernow/gpt.html
the key note is at the bottom of the page:
"Without this on, strange things happen. For instance, rebooting the
machine caused the file system to no longer be mountable or the GPT
table got corrupted."
aha! exactly my problem! I rebooted the machine and watched the
console carefully, and noted this:
* System.map not found unable to check symbols
hmmmm. after some more googling, I found this discussion:
http://tinyurl.com/o57hm
so I found the solution to making this message go away to be to
copy
System.map to /., which is mounted when the message pops up during
the boot process, whereas /boot and /usr are not. then we edit the
block at the end of /sbin/modules-update to be:
if [ -d "`depdir`" -a -f /proc/modules ]
then
if [ -f /System.map ]; then
depmod -a -F /System.map ${KV}
else
ewarn "System.map not found - unable to check symbols"
fi
fi
and viola, the boot process is happy once more.
as an added bonus, this resolves the issue with the filesystem
being
usable after a reboot, and mounting at boot time. woohoo!
thanks to all that replied. it always helps to bounce ideas off
others to get the juices flowing.
cheers,
- Jared
[snip]
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-25 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-24 16:18 [gentoo-server] 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards Jared Klett
2006-08-24 17:20 ` Karl Hiramoto
2006-08-24 18:19 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 19:17 ` Jesse, Rich
2006-08-24 19:44 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 18:48 ` Robert Welz
2006-08-24 19:18 ` Jared Klett
2006-08-24 20:51 ` Robert Welz
2006-08-24 21:14 ` [gentoo-server] 3ware controllers (was: 3.3 TB reiserfs volume not mounting at boot, and is unusable afterwards) Jared Klett
2006-08-24 20:35 ` [gentoo-server] SOLVED (3.3 " Jared Klett
2006-08-25 16:09 ` Jesse, Rich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox