From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QRgQG-0000Ps-4S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:05:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D20A1C105 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FD1C097 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gaston.localnet (unknown [80.71.128.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bangert) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA7731B4006 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:17:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Thilo Bangert Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid? Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:17:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38.5; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4DE5557C.8090106@gocept.com> In-Reply-To: <4DE5557C.8090106@gocept.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106010917.31600.bangert@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 35d6710001683899f732dd3567f404e4 On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:54:20 PM Christian Kauhaus wrote: > Am 31.05.2011 19:36, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > > So, what can I do? > > I would have a closer look at varnish. We use it in production on some > heavy-traffic websites for years and it is fast and really dependable. varnish is a reverse proxy only - it looks like Pandu Poluan is looking for a forward proxy... > > Regards > > Christian