From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JLMu5-0001nM-T1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:15:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D8ADE05C9; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9D4E05C9 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zeus.home.xnull.de (i59F7FA14.versanet.de [89.247.250.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298EB6635D for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Benedikt =?iso-8859-15?q?B=F6hm?= To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] apache static modules Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:15:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47A4ABA9.9040401@4-mail.net> In-Reply-To: <47A4ABA9.9040401@4-mail.net> Organization: Gentoo Foundation Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1504756.nu3M22ON3C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200802021915.42507.hollow@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: d8e633c8-6306-43dd-9e6a-eb0b81ff332b X-Archives-Hash: b9bc260fd38aa21a2139d3206b2127f5 --nextPart1504756.nu3M22ON3C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 02 February 2008 18:43:05 Julian Golderer wrote: > hello sysadmins :) > > is there a performance difference in apache between static and dynamic > linked modules? yes, there is, static modules generally make apache faster > since there is no 'apache-builtin-mods'-file anymore,=20 > all modules have to be either static or dynamic - am i right? correct > why they removed the modules-file? because it breaks binary packages and portage will overwrite it on every=20 update, as outlined at [1] > greets, > julian HTH, Bene [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/apache-upgrading.xml#doc_chap1 --nextPart1504756.nu3M22ON3C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkeks04ACgkQmPFBzbX68WHsLACcDhejrXpBmEZDTI/7XnU3tMXW qBkAmwd1Q7S0pHA5SszpJa40UeDfF0RY =/E4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1504756.nu3M22ON3C-- -- gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org mailing list