* [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content
@ 2005-08-27 21:14 capsel
2005-08-27 21:18 ` Matthijs Langenberg
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: capsel @ 2005-08-27 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Hi...
When I upgraded samba to 3.0.14a from previous (can't remember
version) with same config file content of share is invisible. No one
can get any file even knowing the name but can write one.
I changed directory permisions and owners but still nowone can see content.
How to solve this problem?
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content
2005-08-27 21:14 [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content capsel
@ 2005-08-27 21:18 ` Matthijs Langenberg
2005-08-27 23:01 ` David Miller
2005-08-28 7:41 ` Christian Heim
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matthijs Langenberg @ 2005-08-27 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Op zaterdag 27 augustus 2005 23:14, schreef capsel:
> Hi...
> When I upgraded samba to 3.0.14a from previous (can't remember
> version) with same config file content of share is invisible. No one
> can get any file even knowing the name but can write one.
> I changed directory permisions and owners but still nowone can see content.
> How to solve this problem?
>
Have you already tried using the previous version of samba?
That might give an idea wether it's really the version upgrade that matters.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Matthijs Langenberg <langenberg@m-thijz.com>
Quote Of The Day:
Give me the avowed, the erect, the manly foe,
Bold I can meet -- perhaps may turn his blow!
But of all plagues, good Heaven, thy wrath can send,
Save me, oh save me from the candid friend.
-- George Canning
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content
2005-08-27 21:14 [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content capsel
2005-08-27 21:18 ` Matthijs Langenberg
@ 2005-08-27 23:01 ` David Miller
2005-08-28 7:41 ` Christian Heim
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2005-08-27 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
Can you post your smb.conf? Does testparm reveal any errors?
Some of the defaults may have changed so check the change log for
samba and see if there's anything that may have changed that could
effect your environment. If you run testparm -v it will print out all
settings including the defaults for the values that your conf file
doesn't specify.
--
David
On 8/27/05, capsel <capsel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi...
> When I upgraded samba to 3.0.14a from previous (can't remember
> version) with same config file content of share is invisible. No one
> can get any file even knowing the name but can write one.
> I changed directory permisions and owners but still nowone can see content.
> How to solve this problem?
>
> --
> gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content
2005-08-27 21:14 [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content capsel
2005-08-27 21:18 ` Matthijs Langenberg
2005-08-27 23:01 ` David Miller
@ 2005-08-28 7:41 ` Christian Heim
2005-08-28 9:02 ` capsel
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Heim @ 2005-08-28 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 581 bytes --]
On Saturday 27 August 2005 21:14, capsel wrote:
> Hi...
> When I upgraded samba to 3.0.14a from previous (can't remember
> version) with same config file content of share is invisible. No one
> can get any file even knowing the name but can write one.
> I changed directory permisions and owners but still nowone can see content.
> How to solve this problem?
Check your smb.conf and see if it includes "hide special files = yes". Thats
what caused the error, after the update to 3.0.14a here
--
Christian Heim <phreak@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer (VServer)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content
2005-08-28 7:41 ` Christian Heim
@ 2005-08-28 9:02 ` capsel
2005-08-29 13:59 ` Christian Heim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: capsel @ 2005-08-28 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
It helped :D
Thank you very much!
Is it a bug or my missunderstanding of this option? (or ?)
--
gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content
2005-08-28 9:02 ` capsel
@ 2005-08-29 13:59 ` Christian Heim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Heim @ 2005-08-29 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-server
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 601 bytes --]
On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:02, capsel wrote:
> It helped :D
> Thank you very much!
No problem :)
> Is it a bug or my missunderstanding of this option? (or ?)
It's a bug in <=samba-3.0.14a-r2. See 1 and 2 for more info's.
Basically the function responsible for 'hide special files' is hiding
*everything*. Either upgrade samba to 3.0.14a-r3 or negate the conf-var (hide
special files = no).
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101770
[2] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2514
Christian
--
Christian Heim <phreak@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer (VServer)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-29 12:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-27 21:14 [gentoo-server] samba: invisible content capsel
2005-08-27 21:18 ` Matthijs Langenberg
2005-08-27 23:01 ` David Miller
2005-08-28 7:41 ` Christian Heim
2005-08-28 9:02 ` capsel
2005-08-29 13:59 ` Christian Heim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox