From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E50Dh-0007I2-Ug for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:07:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7GC4teV020112; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:04:55 GMT Received: from bigbrother.ncuk.net (bigbrother.ncuk.net [80.249.96.15]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7GC4qHe011511 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:04:54 GMT Received: from [84.12.112.252] (port=39125 helo=mini.home.pookey.co.uk) by bigbrother.ncuk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.21) id 1E50C7-0001cp-JI; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:05:27 +0100 From: "Ian P. Christian" Organization: Netconnex To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Refreshing vhosts without restarting apache Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:04:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.90 Cc: Darko Luketic References: <20050816140140.52203b98@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20050816140140.52203b98@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1171869.AX4IZiDJJA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508161305.06072.pookey@pookey.co.uk> X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: [-4.9 points, 6.5 required] -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Scan-Signature: b5f1572d5dfb6b9d01148d57ae01ab8f X-Archives-Salt: a2631bdf-a6e8-4f0d-9015-fd01582bdba1 X-Archives-Hash: 308140a836011129c33ec95f879750e1 --nextPart1171869.AX4IZiDJJA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 16 August 2005 13:01, Darko Luketic wrote: > and imho thats not really the way it should be, apache should be restarted > once a day not potentially every 15 minutes. I don't see why it should be restarted at all. If you're not binding to any= =20 new ports, a reload should be fine rather then a restart. =2D-=20 Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk --nextPart1171869.AX4IZiDJJA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDAdZy6jsuvK/fgkoRAmabAJ4+EacI+9hg2glW8yzMVdarilAdmwCguQLb sSxB25z3B2H5CGqaI0IsTgM= =7K5L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1171869.AX4IZiDJJA-- -- gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list