From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EduNr-0004r2-TQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:57:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAKIuFfD022045; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:56:15 GMT Received: from senior.ro ([193.25.112.232]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAKIuDaf024003 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:56:14 GMT Received: (qmail 27428 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2005 20:57:59 +0200 Received: from 82.76.89.105 by ns3 (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1027. f-prot: 4.5.4/3.16.6. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(82.76.89.105):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 12.396945 secs); 20 Nov 2005 18:57:59 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: radu@zona.ro via ns3 X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25st (Clear:RC:0(82.76.89.105):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 12.396945 secs Process 27415) Received: from unknown (HELO black) (radu@zona.ro@82.76.89.105) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2005 20:57:46 +0200 Message-ID: <018e01c5ee04$0da20910$69594c52@black> From: "Radu Herinean" To: References: Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] webmail software Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:56:02 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Archives-Salt: 2b2e44fc-fc1d-4a44-a5ba-8f09cb4c2d33 X-Archives-Hash: 411a6a7ccd036b8444e037fd386c1768 i've seen some big fat warnings about multiple vulnerabilities in the horde framework. is that an old status that is no longer valid? to also give some value to my posting: i am also looking into this matter, but i am looking for an alternative to SM. so far i found http://ilohamail.org/ and openwebmail (masked in portage) that are worth considering. iloha seems faster, i will have to check how it performs when used for all the domains hosted on that server. regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pierre Cassimans" To: Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] webmail software > > > >>From: kashani >>Reply-To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org >>To: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org >>Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] webmail software >>Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:29:46 -0500 >> >>Michael Irey wrote: >>>Hi everyone, I am reviewing webmail software to be be installed in a high >>>use production environment. The mail server is qmail with vpopmail. >>> >>>I am looking for: >>> * stability >>> * security >>> * speed >>> * ability to change the look and feel >>> * overall features >>> >>>The ones I have reviewed so far are horde/imp, squirrelmail, and DWmail. >> >> My old virtual system was running Squirrelmail, but on the new system >> we're running both Squirrel and Horde/IMP. Most customers seem to like >> the IMP interface better and its HTML mail support seems to work unlike >> SM. We will likely drop SM at some point in the future. >> If you do install both even if just for testing you should modify the >> preferences so that IMP and SM use the same folders. By default IMP uses >> sent-mail, drafts, and a trash folder feature is not on. I changed that >> to Sent, Drafts, and turned on Trash so that users switching between >> Thunderbird, SM, and IMP had the same folder setup. You'll also need to >> turn on HTML mail display in one of the conf files as well in IMP. >> I do find the folder setup in IMP a little funky to browse through, but >> that's really my only major complaint so far. >> >>kashani >>-- >>gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list >> > > which version of Horde/Imp have you running? I have Imp 4.0.3 running and > i'm feeling a big performance hit with this version over the old 3.x ones. > Is there a big speed difference between SM and Horde/Imp? > > Pierre Cassimans > > Pierre Cassimans > > > -- > gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-server@gentoo.org mailing list