From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RSYgV-0008LS-Mi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:33:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D7EC21C027; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88BB21C03C for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp18 with SMTP id 18so6320955ywp.40 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.154.3 with SMTP id g3mr22759067yhk.119.1321900356699; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ESCHOEDLERNB ([187.60.184.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm31511809anc.14.2011.11.21.10.32.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Eduardo Schoedler" To: References: <201111210916.31403.ahodgson@simkin.ca> In-Reply-To: Subject: RES: [gentoo-server] Failover-capable DNS server? Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:32:32 -0200 Message-ID: <000b01cca87b$f0bc0740$d23415c0$@esds.com.br> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01CCA86B.2D3448B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQEt1lkITg12Ku/CHD6N67EjjwfYnwJV2dtPAjpzq9eW0Mht0A== Content-Language: pt-br X-Archives-Salt: 38f18baf-51e7-461a-b1bf-9d53566ffc13 X-Archives-Hash: c03dbf668b6a9b190077fce905e45c5c This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CCA86B.2D3448B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, PowerDNS and MaraDNS are good. You can write some scripts with heartbeatd to change the responde of = your dns... and change the TTL to 5 minutes or less. =20 -- Eduardo Schoedler =20 =20 De: Pandu Poluan [mailto:pandu@poluan.info]=20 Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de novembro de 2011 15:39 Para: gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org Assunto: Re: [gentoo-server] Failover-capable DNS server? =20 On Nov 22, 2011 12:19 AM, "Alan Hodgson" wrote: > > On Monday 21 November 2011 01:52:09 Pandu Poluan wrote: > > Anyone can recommend me a DNS server that has such capability? Or = how > > to implement this ability with maybe Python or (*shivers*) Perl? > > You can write a pipe backend for PowerDNS to do this sort of thing. = The > protocol to talk to PowerDNS is quite simple. > At first glance, I agree. Using PowerDNS instead of BIND also would = introduce a necessary "genetic variety" to my nameservers. One question, though: Its PowerDNS really good? Performance-wise, = security-wise, or whatever-wise? Any 'gotcha's I need to be aware of? Rgds, ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CCA86B.2D3448B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, PowerDNS and MaraDNS are good.

You can write some scripts with heartbeatd to change the responde of = your dns... and change the TTL to 5 minutes or = less.

 

--

Eduardo Schoedler

 

 

De: = Pandu Poluan [mailto:pandu@poluan.info]
Enviada em: = segunda-feira, 21 de novembro de 2011 15:39
Para: = gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org
Assunto: Re: [gentoo-server] = Failover-capable DNS server?

 


On Nov 22, 2011 12:19 AM, = "Alan Hodgson" <ahodgson@simkin.ca> = wrote:
>
> On Monday 21 November 2011 01:52:09 Pandu Poluan = wrote:
> > Anyone can recommend me a DNS server that has such = capability? Or how
> > to implement this ability with maybe = Python or (*shivers*) Perl?
>
> You can write a pipe backend = for PowerDNS to do this sort of thing. The
> protocol to talk to = PowerDNS is quite simple.
>

At first glance, I = agree. Using PowerDNS instead of BIND also would introduce a necessary = "genetic variety" to my nameservers.

One = question, though: Its PowerDNS really good? Performance-wise, = security-wise, or whatever-wise? Any 'gotcha's I need to be aware = of?

Rgds,

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CCA86B.2D3448B0--