From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JSNcj-0004ma-MW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:26:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FCEAE043A; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52252E041B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so270929wah.10 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:26:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9JMnfh7vIeQfuTpwYl4zWlq/jBRe6sjHTpn/PbjaaTM=; b=rxx119JC+dmo/arTdOz8t9iEN5yaCNu5G7ZcXDtYK8PQlNxycKbY3POGyOmoncUg93nWJC2R1zjuSGQNf3zgLWR4XXNRmVUjPTkekHLpsfrm+dZt0XN7Mu6JxAyiUy6pEUDpMx9SYG/rZdqyplQk4iGvjiSRd9EovRq0forxLiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OwmCvsUQPGFgAxnrTay8MgTxy0kSxLxchhqdHg5IDb2CJlO9W7EuK2iSiLrfSrVdySq8aCf0k7DLs63E586zQUq4wPWQVvBvwGXurqg7BC6yPHk14YffDxHmB3bkqqVC9OxYCqrMDJbhNjv3ftXuMz2aRemog95RGdvqQoYvcnk= Received: by 10.115.55.1 with SMTP id h1mr8333690wak.69.1203647162817; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.111.19 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:26:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:26:02 +0800 From: "Eduardo Tongson" To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Kernel Security + KISS In-Reply-To: <47BDD0CF.7030100@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1203574802.6841.14.camel@notebook> <20080221070213.GA6385@quasar.las> <83c2b2e00802210114q1d5beba5gcaa478df808020d6@mail.gmail.com> <47BD458E.3010906@gmail.com> <2d11f51c0802210509w770934c1wf52e3d6ce5d1d3a7@mail.gmail.com> <47BDA52A.2040305@gmail.com> <47BDD0CF.7030100@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 0e818244-5eeb-4d9a-bac9-ff867c82e805 X-Archives-Hash: 61a68cc589899070094081af9927c49c Yes. We should each have assigned tasks which will depend on our respective skill and trait. -- ed*eonsec On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:28 AM, doppelgaenger wrote: > George Prowse wrote: > > Eduardo Tongson wrote: > >> Nice plan. I think you are more able to lead. Can we communicate more > >> in email perhaps a google group or list. IRC is not efficient for > >> people in different timezones. > >> > >> -- ed*eonsec > >> > > I agree, a list or group would be better at pooling the people at your > > disposal > > I also think it would be a good idea to set up some requirements profile > so people can identify them self in some kind of matrix ? > > I basically volunteer but not sure what use I could be with a background > as an ISO, limited time and basic C knowledge. > > --doppelgaenger > > > -- > gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list