public inbox for gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin van Haaren <kevin@vanhaaren.net>
To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Mini Gentoo in VMWare
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 11:46:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E2A0A677F0194D4F615E53F1@Blossom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.tif9pvzhyguj3e@you.and.your.horse>

--On November 3, 2006 12:04:33 PM -0500 7v5w7go9ub0o 
<7v5w7go9ub0o@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Lots of interest in VMs lately - Is this to increase security (isolating
> servers and components in case one is compromised)? Or perhaps you are
> isolating components for the purpose of evaluating them?

there are additional benefits, mainly for enterprise use, such as being 
able to move the virtual server to a new box in case of failure of the 
first box. This is much cheaper than maintaining an identically configured 
second box. VMWare's high-end (not free) product can do this automatically 
if partnered with a SAN. Using SAN technology the second box could even be 
off-site, providing a virtually instant disaster recovery plan (just not a 
cheap one.)

You could even save the cost of redundant box by using Amazon's Elastic 
Compute Cloud as your redundancy. Keep a copy of the image on Amazon S3 
then fire up the image if the main one goes down.  Might be a bit slower 
but that beats being down.

Also snapshot technology is getting pretty cool, where you can take a 
snapshot, upgrade a virtual box, and if the upgrade fails just roll back to 
the snapshot. Beats a backup/restore cycle by a mile.

-- 
gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-04 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <9b1675090611022143u4d5fc834ucdaba614fec34a55@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <200611031515.59246.harmgeerts@home.nl>
2006-11-03 17:04   ` [gentoo-security] Re: Mini Gentoo in VMWare 7v5w7go9ub0o
2006-11-03 17:20     ` Antoine Martin
2006-11-03 17:38       ` [gentoo-hardened] " Javi Moreno
2006-11-03 18:13     ` Brian G. Peterson
2006-11-04 17:46     ` Kevin van Haaren [this message]
     [not found]     ` <454C9022.9000105@my-universe.com>
     [not found]       ` <eiimq5$28e$1@sea.gmane.org>
     [not found]         ` <1162666496.5546.2.camel@localhost>
2006-11-04 23:47           ` [gentoo-security] Re: [gentoo-hardened] " 7v5w7go9ub0o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E2A0A677F0194D4F615E53F1@Blossom.local \
    --to=kevin@vanhaaren.net \
    --cc=gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox