From: Kevin van Haaren <kevin@vanhaaren.net>
To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Mini Gentoo in VMWare
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 11:46:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E2A0A677F0194D4F615E53F1@Blossom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.tif9pvzhyguj3e@you.and.your.horse>
--On November 3, 2006 12:04:33 PM -0500 7v5w7go9ub0o
<7v5w7go9ub0o@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Lots of interest in VMs lately - Is this to increase security (isolating
> servers and components in case one is compromised)? Or perhaps you are
> isolating components for the purpose of evaluating them?
there are additional benefits, mainly for enterprise use, such as being
able to move the virtual server to a new box in case of failure of the
first box. This is much cheaper than maintaining an identically configured
second box. VMWare's high-end (not free) product can do this automatically
if partnered with a SAN. Using SAN technology the second box could even be
off-site, providing a virtually instant disaster recovery plan (just not a
cheap one.)
You could even save the cost of redundant box by using Amazon's Elastic
Compute Cloud as your redundancy. Keep a copy of the image on Amazon S3
then fire up the image if the main one goes down. Might be a bit slower
but that beats being down.
Also snapshot technology is getting pretty cool, where you can take a
snapshot, upgrade a virtual box, and if the upgrade fails just roll back to
the snapshot. Beats a backup/restore cycle by a mile.
--
gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-04 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9b1675090611022143u4d5fc834ucdaba614fec34a55@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200611031515.59246.harmgeerts@home.nl>
2006-11-03 17:04 ` [gentoo-security] Re: Mini Gentoo in VMWare 7v5w7go9ub0o
2006-11-03 17:20 ` Antoine Martin
2006-11-03 17:38 ` [gentoo-hardened] " Javi Moreno
2006-11-03 18:13 ` Brian G. Peterson
2006-11-04 17:46 ` Kevin van Haaren [this message]
[not found] ` <454C9022.9000105@my-universe.com>
[not found] ` <eiimq5$28e$1@sea.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <1162666496.5546.2.camel@localhost>
2006-11-04 23:47 ` [gentoo-security] Re: [gentoo-hardened] " 7v5w7go9ub0o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E2A0A677F0194D4F615E53F1@Blossom.local \
--to=kevin@vanhaaren.net \
--cc=gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox