From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-security+bounces-855-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JUpEx-0001nh-6q
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:20:27 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E4E0E053B;
	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.186])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9FFE04DD
	for <gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:19:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so3305034tia.10
        for <gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:19:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=/I0k8D8/qXP4TBs5t3T32KUSxjsj9JcZSrZVIIdh3nI=;
        b=TI9nfbWsUBX4tD2zuSFQ92M8zXg6kOGkWw4MMnVlTa2/1CRtUZCyylkR7+SSQBZjGByrByt8+GcDHJt/W+2i2n99l/ddRAnf7jtNzYNktHUi3kqATmjMB/hms2W83NeUwRdKgDwRDIeE4n4g32p/Q+jKeeJqanjatSSeDv2NN7s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Zy5BnnakuI3ZTdbvYW2NeC0gzPeUbKSjLCwkt/bjfRb32ZhyfWOYfVDoUCaPLgKWlfekzaZ2qJvloYWwMPqOF3tNDWPB2yvaE0J5WgcyBfGey0hY4uHoZJxxyaG5imXPuPwi7LMoh9QNmsPJdtDsGau9P3uGmElKLX43fLuxZ1k=
Received: by 10.142.187.2 with SMTP id k2mr6571484wff.25.1204229970718;
        Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:19:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.212.15 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:19:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <44a1f4d20802281219y3de6c57bk5f959b141911e463@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:19:30 -0500
From: "Mansour Moufid" <mansourmoufid@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Encryption Ciphers
In-Reply-To: <1204223395.6671.52.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-security+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-security+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-security+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-security.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1204138691.10427.152.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ>
	 <47C6D49B.3010608@immerda.ch>
	 <1204223395.6671.52.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ>
X-Archives-Salt: 15198cf9-dc26-45d9-8bc7-c83bc0a6c1bf
X-Archives-Hash: 3fd8a10def965b40b146ed4baea9f05d

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Florian Philipp
<lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote:
>  One last question for everyone who has read this rather long mail (thank
>  you, btw): What exactly is benbi in aes-lrw-benbi:sha256 and what should
>  I choose for XTS? The kernel description states plain but essiv and
>  benbi work as well.
>

benbi is an IV generation algorithm. If you look at the dm-crypt
sources [1], benbi stands for "big-endian 'narrow block'-count" (not
sure where they got the `i' from...). There's also one called bewbi,
which I thought was entertaining.

Sincerely,
Mansour Moufid

[1] http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~baker/devices/lxr/http/source/linux/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c#L110
-- 
gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list