From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHiRK-00008v-A0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:45:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8KDarmn004390; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:36:53 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8KDXPHa025180 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:33:26 GMT Received: from [35.13.8.216] (13-8-216.client.wireless.msu.edu [35.13.8.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8KDd7Cj021835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:39:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <433010FC.70106@egr.msu.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:39:08 -0400 From: Alec Warner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050724) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-security@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Kernels and GLSAs References: <432FEDD4.1030604@umtstrial.co.uk> <200509200716.37148.brian@braverock.com> <1127219390.16000.33.camel@bunyip> In-Reply-To: <1127219390.16000.33.camel@bunyip> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 541415ad-d2d9-4b48-a914-b85663d40c41 X-Archives-Hash: 0a6efeb0a2744f900c07478a89d3d4fd W.Kenworthy wrote: >Is there a bug number that references this? The older 0.2.0 works OK. >Despite the big warning that this is experimental, the fact that it >works reasonably well makes it indispensable for those who are trying to >run reasonably secure systems - what other distro offers similar >functionality? One place/utility for this was a great idea! > >I saw the kernel stuff and still think this approach is short sighted, >and potentially leaves users exposed. > >BillK > > > Does anyone have a link to the no kernel GLSA news? FYI I use "glsa-check -t new" and it works great for me. >On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 07:16 -0500, Brian G. Peterson wrote: > > >>On Tuesday 20 September 2005 06:09 am, Calum wrote: >> >> >>>I prefer the idea that tracking one source (GLSAs) would provide me with >>> >>> > > > -- gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list