From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28199 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 13:55:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2004 13:55:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CRswz-0006OV-8D for arch-gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:55:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 18452 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2004 13:55:31 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-security-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-security@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14221 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 13:55:31 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:55:23 +0000 From: Anthony Metcalf To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20041110135523.00007248@Halloween> In-Reply-To: <1100095387.10299.33.camel@cobra> References: <20041110020620.F1ADE2B3DB@smtp.istop.com> <20041109233509.A19723@netdirect.ca> <200411101400.39645.jstubbs@work-at.co.jp> <1100091284.10299.19.camel@cobra> <20041110125531.GA13071@aeon.user.lan.at> <1100093186.10299.27.camel@cobra> <20041110133121.00007f3c@Halloween> <1100095387.10299.33.camel@cobra> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.3.0; Win32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__10_Nov_2004_13_55_23_+0000_/p_uPzcyzqebAcec" Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Out of air X-Archives-Salt: 43c4f275-71af-4329-b09d-b58efe6be547 X-Archives-Hash: 1f7b885ee0c50bcfb48b842544b3fc36 --Signature=_Wed__10_Nov_2004_13_55_23_+0000_/p_uPzcyzqebAcec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:03:07 +0000 Antoine Martin wrote: > I think someone already tried it on this list, a few minutes IIRC. real 10m39.694s user 1m11.500s sys 2m5.833s That would make my emerge sync 1/3 longer, and create: -rw-r--r-- 1 nevyn users 7.6M Nov 10 14:51 portage_md5_sums.txt That is just to create the hashes, and that 7.6M file would have to be added to the portage tree. *That* isn't even the point though. The point is the work that would have to be done by the devs on a range of systems, and the increased load that would be put on the servers. You think it would be worth it to have the "band-aid" in a few weeks and the compleate fix in 6 months? I'd rather wait for the compleate fix in the knowledge that I am getting the best alternative sooner. Let us agree to disagree, after the dev's have made there choice as is their perogative. --Signature=_Wed__10_Nov_2004_13_55_23_+0000_/p_uPzcyzqebAcec Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBkh3OOohvONSMAioRAtlcAKCVBfbny2xplH9Nk+0FUawNHI8FlwCcDZDi 5wGcxZ3e7sVuaJF3YUJE1GY= =XK4V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__10_Nov_2004_13_55_23_+0000_/p_uPzcyzqebAcec--