From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-security-return-1602-arch-gentoo-security=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 3679 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 03:14:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2004 03:14:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CRivo-000630-9I for arch-gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:14:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 28018 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2004 03:13:35 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-security-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-security@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-security-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-security-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-security-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-security.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-security@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8121 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 03:13:35 +0000 From: Anthony Gorecki <anthony@ectrolinux.com> To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:10:48 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <87654ewlbt.fsf@peti.cryp.to> <41917C27.60303@moonlight.pt> <87actqv1ty.fsf@peti.cryp.to> In-Reply-To: <87actqv1ty.fsf@peti.cryp.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2608072.1OSYpp31bX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411091910.50108.anthony@ectrolinux.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1-gr0 (2004-10-22) on selene.nvanc.ectrolinux.com X-Spam-Status: No; -5.8 hits out of a required 6.0 X-Spam-Report: * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Out of air X-Archives-Salt: eba78c52-57c5-4606-bb9e-a0af0b42eb3f X-Archives-Hash: 26329bb69512505d10ca4889031cde96 --nextPart2608072.1OSYpp31bX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 November 2004 7:07 pm, Peter Simons wrote: > Fixing a vulnerability that threatens your user's machines > without me having to bitch and moan for _days_ would be > fair, too, and you don't do it either. So I think we are > even. This thread is degenerating into a heated debate to the likes of which I wo= uld=20 expect from elementary school children. We know what needs to be done, and = it=20 will be done as soon as the developers are able; I agree with one of the=20 previous comments: feel free to implement the code instead of complaining. Leave it at that. =2D-=20 Anthony Gorecki Ectro-Linux Foundation --nextPart2608072.1OSYpp31bX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQZGGub8NHCarD3E0AQLvZQ//bApriY+1GrjhxKj0abyhlm5CmAABsAGq /IPChQzrrcE40ewaeK8/SlrKE6DRgxySMeN+v2oACvv5/rvBi5VJaN+TcxqgJ3Wr O5d0XYdmIeqsjj0uHX1itYqm/HXlG9+1fR4gQYLdpc57wrvSyC/F/WX0CEc8LM3y J5h/1OLbJuxauOZEPQQ6rz48rCll5z2yd8qu4nGxBG+y8P5FZLpHH9K/z7G0GAMj vHVz34GqCuMpzQNV9e3UcXE56Wp18en+I/nHHRkq5ogX7TWnaMmSFje4TkoldDh2 C/mDZybtkWoxXiBJXocslOm3gTj2POSx7ST4aPtd6MMlBN48RgtjJT8UlTVB4B9/ 9DWNbyAhQjoiDMNxouQWZHR2cWFgFiO/6uJ87otmJyNrtVcEyDaBFEEl4r+n3kki 1vqSPx0uUSj61CVJQlIhwx5MXCf+y2WW1K6IzN8NL37HXenscgb5hH+lfAnQqYoB xFcHhMfyL5EnbEf3taLqR/3djuPC3u45LCkJT3Bgc/c/Eyj/jBvKnwrqyldpectA +64DU+JWOzhRKqg+rwhHQWZRqHd+eZBZB6Sd3arnhlsyAZW95e5IJz8718/Icg7Z QwTV7GYlAJW/rbmqLRwb1cKdh9c13cWLMmQLaZLviax5GIKsmgIOo7N6aEUF1aJp EpU5zX4UeyY= =cgLj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2608072.1OSYpp31bX--