From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-science+bounces-688-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JU2BE-0001Y9-TC
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:57:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF218E0304;
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.186])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DE5E0304
for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so1559352tia.10
for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:57:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=T3LGgxzEJJRd5fojwYME6isCdzwTpe7YBdN+FDCuabU=;
b=aLx5F+vqs9iuSGQZ/+9jdGnWqIhBercUiJG7+H8LEsxu6kjanbrk1Mq/+3+v3OzDrmZ58MRWLNwKFEeMqTTQGT9a8EyeZcynWuwKyRinNGrcJLG2UFpA5HUh8KG0Ql3BSYsMq8M5vl2aF7oMPMXZyM5cGI/goYumW3IC/XAchSs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=pzsONilPAraCygjicX9FVH6wrFGCyif5KMh1C1x+fm/zCp1ndgWFv1oZSAkxTuEXxAffbGhRyerOako7Pc1XxX4sn2hwtXLRMpueijZ1C1TGi66aH5ce04gt0ApCiRejNVyLQH0id0A4G3rIgc9jfZ7Jb/a2HGteh/QoC1XMoC0=
Received: by 10.151.105.13 with SMTP id h13mr1717001ybm.180.1204041436429;
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:57:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.178.7 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:57:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <df02a1a80802260757h739f3b37l9f1253082fae4cc7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:57:16 +0300
From: "Alexey Shvetsov" <alexxyum@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Empi, should it be in the science overlay?
In-Reply-To: <20080226154538.GC3622@mejis.cold-front>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080226154538.GC3622@mejis.cold-front>
X-Archives-Salt: 530f4e18-9278-4434-a729-b611aeaa7330
X-Archives-Hash: cc78a79d0b3c2eee73f6934302723cc9
Thats Cool !
I'll test it on my cluster =)
it uses infiniband and mvpich2 but some people want to use ordinary
eth as interconnect so it will be very useful =)
2008/2/26, Justin Bronder <jsbronder@gentoo.org>:
> I've been spending the majority of my Gentoo-related time working on a
> solution to bug 44132 [1], basically, trying to find a way to gracefully
> handle multiple installs of various MPI implementations at the same time in
> Gentoo. Theres more information about the solution in my devspace [2], but
> a quick summary is that there is a new package (empi) that is much like
> crossdev, a new eselect module for empi, and a new eclass that handles both
> mpi implementations and packages depending on mpi.
>
> So, I think I have pushed this work far enough along for it to actually be
> somewhat officially offered. My question then, is where should this be
> located? There are several mpi packages in the science overlay already, so
> should I push this work to there, or would it be more appropriate to make a
> new overlay specifically for hp-cluster?
>
> Future work related to this project will be getting all mpi implementations
> and dependant packages converted in the same overlay before bringing it up on
> -dev for discussion about inclusion into the main tree.
>
> I have no real preference either way, but the science team does already have
> an overlay :) Let me know what you think.
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44132
> [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~jsbronder/README.empi.txt
>
> --
>
> Justin Bronder
>
>
--
Gentoo GNU/Linux 2.6.23 Dual Xeon
Mail to
alexxyum@gmail.com
alexxy@gentoo.ru
--
gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org mailing list