From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GIBjX-0007cK-57 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:06:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7TM6BJc032398; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:06:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7TM6Am0013874 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:06:11 GMT Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D79642DD for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:06:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Dittrich To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] freemat-2.0 at gentooscience.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <44F1D789.3000902@vkonovalov.ru> <44F4837F.50400@vkonovalov.ru> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: d7fae1cf-0daa-443b-8944-337ee435d8af X-Archives-Hash: 1fa83ff59360d32a93db83326cb20be8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Andrey G. Grozin wrote: > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Vadim wrote: > Arrgh!! > > This kind of access violation again. I was told that they have been fixed > once and for all. > > This has nothing to do with matio. This sort of thing happend to me > innumerable times, for various packages. What happens: > > 1. Some ebuild (usually with the USE flag "doc") starts latex > 2. Some font used in the latex file has not yet been used on this > particular computer > 3. latex starts metafont to generate this font > 4. metafont wants to write it to /var/cache/fonts > 5. This triggers sandbox violation > > I don't know how to fight against this. The only way seems to emerge with > sandboxing switched off. The next time the same package can be emerged in > the normal way, because all fonts used in its documentation has been > already generated. > > This is *absolutely* generic problem, and something should be done about > it. > Hi, Have a look at [1] and the links therein which provide some info on how to work with the sandbox. Keep in mind, though, that these commands should only be used if there really is no other way (such as patching the makefile etc.) to get rid of the sandbox violations; the sandbox is present for a very good reason! An ebuild in portage that shows these commands in action would be app-text/ptex-3.1.8.1_p20050418 Best, Markus [1] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/sandbox/index.html - -- Markus Dittrich (markusle) Gentoo Linux Developer Scientific applications -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE9LpRxlRwCwb7k40RAsHdAJ0Y6APCXQdpFYEuuoVnZoCKQXD2bACfZzyg bcfIKf5BxusFS4ukN0xx3Mc= =/7jY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list