From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SFXLx-0005Gn-FP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:02:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92184E0C35 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A278E1066 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so535768wib.10 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:23:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Gafb7kxZJLdJZZQhT+ubDzLufCUgBM54EQ+qj1vmagA=; b=RfAX2h9z5Rjyefc2E6miB/Ll1oq2HWOctmcgycB3kZjSeZhn34RM+kBdjnGYBDnyPO 0jlErWKZoN4A30/tDyiRmXWTuCP5ZwL1XrgSlrWKa7m2cr/5nwMIwCnMQBFW/HJ+rsOn zgQciYlzuDkPRoPWhzQrQwdc1+cEr6pM46cj1RkVjN9uXsXM6r1brvw0kJwuZr3n+Lml CW/csc5WvvbJs0qXbr7Sludpfjy/alyNjTPBE28rQXLGhiLvkSyoRTLIZBOmvLFypUbF 0uPnR4bPxA4H4dFd5B9SOoPxrC3D7mHYAzAQLqDIjs8aq/xjIVR2c2OuG8JhBTwu+Dzx pobA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.103.134 with SMTP id fw6mr9433573wib.0.1333567418142; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.227.34 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:23:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F61B53B.3050801@gentoo.org> <4F61BE74.4020308@web.de> <4F61C14D.9010301@gentoo.org> <20120404160946.20558b52.lembark@wrkhors.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:23:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Github repo is Live & Kicking From: My Th To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 6973b400-9ca0-4fc6-a23e-ffb95157df2f X-Archives-Hash: 8e701efbc6b33f8ccbacfee8de4fac32 2012/4/4 Christoph Junghans : > 2012/4/4 Steven Lembark : >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:15:41 +0100 >> Kacper Kowalik wrote: >> >>> On 03/15/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Borm wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > what are with users that only have write access to the original overlay? >>> > Do they need a github account in order to further contribute to the sci >>> > overlay? >>> It's not mandatory so they don't need to, though I've strongly encourage >>> to do so. >>> > What will happen if they push their changes just to g.o.g ? >>> When a person with access to both repos does git pull --all, it pull >>> changes from both, and during push --all it will be naturally migrated >>> to github. Of course it also works the other way around. As far as my >>> short experience with that workflow goes it's almost indistinguishable >>> to what we had so far. Only pull/push time is slightly longer >> >> It might be worth adding a "stable" branch to the >> repository. Goal there is that changes to into the >> trunk and ones found to work or that pass more tests >> can get selectively merged into the stable branch. >> >> Makes it easeir to catch minor bugs after a commit. > IMO, stable stuff should go in the default portage tree (gx86). I am > against having too many layers of "stable". > > Christoph I second that. For stable is the main tree. Reinis