From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-science+bounces-1679-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BEC138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B8B221C015
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5488DE0782
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com (mail-qa0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: bicatali)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B50BE33D916
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qaat11 with SMTP id t11so1071541qaa.19
        for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.19.6 with SMTP id y6mr2381181qaa.17.1348668579564; Wed, 26
 Sep 2012 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.120.201 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5062E508.6080905@slingshot.co.nz>
References: <alpine.LRH.1.10.1110111136210.3652@star.inp.nsk.su>
	<CAPtnn5H-okYenrzNYSMgnY34pV=fjCOGBVhVP4S7qZcm6ZqF-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LRH.1.10.1209261001200.14663@star.inp.nsk.su>
	<50629808.7060604@gentoo.org>
	<5062E508.6080905@slingshot.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:09:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA-OU2o+bp4nhDZ_M24SrQ4Hxk0u4sTQF2jkPk7o2qZx=jAMCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] blas/lapack stuff
From: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Fabbro?= <bicatali@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: b0d3c83a-d2f2-48f9-8ac7-6aef17546a4e
X-Archives-Hash: f908a0f9ae6f32ddeed1e6eec21a9677

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Francois Bissey
<fbissey@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:

> If Sebastian had pushed it a little bit more we could have had
> /usr/lib(64)/libblas-reference.so and no libblas whatsoever. Which may
> be an idea just to catch packages that just do -lblas.

Which I did for ealier versions of {blas,lapack}-reference, it use to
link to -lrefblas and -lreflapack.
I'll fix this again.

--=20
S=C3=A9bastien