* Re: [gentoo-science] [PATCH 00/10] alternatives-2.eclass updates
@ 2014-01-21 21:26 99% ` François Bissey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: François Bissey @ 2014-01-21 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
On 2014-01-22 10:21, justin wrote:
> On 21/01/14 18:04, Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
>> * given the number of bugs, we should keep the linking to the
>> reference
>> names libraries, so we could eselect providers without re-compiling
>> all
>> reverse dependencies. We could do this in the open sourced providers
>> by
>> changing the soname of the libraries we compile, and in the binary
>> ones
>> (mkl,amcl...) with a link script generated library.
>
> I don't get this point. Why do we need to play around with sonames?
> Doesn't this bring more problems and maintainer burden then letting the
> consumer recompile reverse dependencies? Are the libs all ABI
> compatible?
>
All libs are supposed to be ABI compatible. For soname look at my
previous post.
If you want to interchange libblas on the fly you need to have the same
soname
for the library.
Francois
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-20 17:53 [gentoo-science] [PATCH 00/10] alternatives-2.eclass updates Reinis Danne
2014-01-21 17:04 ` Sébastien Fabbro
2014-01-21 21:21 ` justin
2014-01-21 21:26 99% ` François Bissey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox