* Re: [gentoo-science] [PATCH 00/10] alternatives-2.eclass updates
@ 2014-01-21 21:21 99% ` justin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: justin @ 2014-01-21 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 631 bytes --]
On 21/01/14 18:04, Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
> * given the number of bugs, we should keep the linking to the reference
> names libraries, so we could eselect providers without re-compiling all
> reverse dependencies. We could do this in the open sourced providers by
> changing the soname of the libraries we compile, and in the binary ones
> (mkl,amcl...) with a link script generated library.
I don't get this point. Why do we need to play around with sonames?
Doesn't this bring more problems and maintainer burden then letting the
consumer recompile reverse dependencies? Are the libs all ABI compatible?
Jusitn
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-20 17:53 [gentoo-science] [PATCH 00/10] alternatives-2.eclass updates Reinis Danne
2014-01-21 17:04 ` Sébastien Fabbro
2014-01-21 21:21 99% ` justin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox