From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83373138247 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3E54E1204; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52AF5E11FF for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jmac.jlec.de (ip-62-143-20-168.unitymediagroup.de [62.143.20.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0927133FA43; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52DEE4C4.9010108@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:21:08 +0100 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [PATCH 00/10] alternatives-2.eclass updates References: <1390240392-12173-1-git-send-email-rei4dan@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="neLU95FJp49xDw4GRkxmTL4KBaW7sIW10" X-Archives-Salt: c1a7586b-d5f8-4b47-8fb0-80656cd55942 X-Archives-Hash: 9e858cd38a95c7a791536e404b225664 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --neLU95FJp49xDw4GRkxmTL4KBaW7sIW10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/01/14 18:04, S=C3=A9bastien Fabbro wrote: > * given the number of bugs, we should keep the linking to the reference= > names libraries, so we could eselect providers without re-compiling all= > reverse dependencies. We could do this in the open sourced providers by= > changing the soname of the libraries we compile, and in the binary ones= > (mkl,amcl...) with a link script generated library. I don't get this point. Why do we need to play around with sonames? Doesn't this bring more problems and maintainer burden then letting the consumer recompile reverse dependencies? Are the libs all ABI compatible?= Jusitn --neLU95FJp49xDw4GRkxmTL4KBaW7sIW10 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLe5MQACgkQgAnW8HDreRb8jQCgy4MLDXBnb7hMEGZtsV13+aR+ yeoAoJaT5HdTEj4tERKNQ38nRkqXoTkd =R7ID -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --neLU95FJp49xDw4GRkxmTL4KBaW7sIW10--