From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LlWIc-0003fG-Vg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:37:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39F19E058C; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f172.google.com (mail-bw0-f172.google.com [209.85.218.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9207E058C for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so1357057bwz.34 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:37:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZuuLWTtP7FkXqz6lN1pbuX++Heh0eZa9NIQWyiuMqUs=; b=vjZlxEv61/0Lct3AxNikxSvuTb61JqDfe1IDbG750qhSknaF6n8/QlyhlTWZ9SawJm 7BYq4+6TGLgpbgNgjHms28LH0UB7MmniqA8749JqNP1T03IGRcOWAm/OIzeVEj0DXJ0H F3IYKpyv7LWBQ3cGmpcd0VpdH/iH+mUipvfFY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KUI845ep5GDD12uisDa6XHkjqH1KyAOTMxWuFOdMOag8NKPBvR3oqt6MQIagOkndp3 35jJV1+aHccxg4HnNmqLSKHVLFrq7pQd7qZLoTJxI3loPel+EDjc254x4GV2hdPmqW/j Fp1bni1umD8eI7K64maUSCcPcsf7Lm4q780SA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vittorio.giovara@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.114.207 with SMTP id f15mr5446116faq.90.1237761465045; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:37:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <22644279.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <22644279.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:37:44 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cc2b438336487f44 Message-ID: <4de51c660903221537s666114bic286385bfdf65e96@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] octave forge From: Vittorio Giovara To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68dbd9770d5da0465bccc94 X-Archives-Salt: 907410c4-e837-4db0-b2c7-7e2749bb2a13 X-Archives-Hash: 16259b9067cff5256bbbf2e40837bbd2 --0016e68dbd9770d5da0465bccc94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, atsui wrote: > markusle wrote: > juantxorena wrote: > > > > Hopefully GCC-4.3 is going to be stabilized soon. Is there any comment > > on this? > > > > Does anyone know if this is still a problem? > > i've built the whole openib tree with gcc-4.3.2 with no problems (with the exception of mlx4, but that should be a common problem) Vitto --0016e68dbd9770d5da0465bccc94 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, atsui <= span dir=3D"ltr"><alextsui05@gma= il.com> wrote:
markusle wrote:
juantxorena wrote:
>
> Hopefully GCC-4.3 is going to be stabilized soon. Is there any comment=
> on this?
>

Does anyone know if this is still a problem?


i've built the whole openib tree with gcc-4.3.2 = with no problems (with the exception of mlx4, but that should be a common p= roblem)

Vitto
--0016e68dbd9770d5da0465bccc94--