From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rz8Hn-0004Oq-3t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:02:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6CB1E0F2A for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81050E0B18 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (178-36-105-38.adsl.inetia.pl [178.36.105.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: xarthisius) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DD061B400A for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F410232.7080407@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:07:46 +0100 From: Kacper Kowalik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] moving the science overlay to github? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig68507764A7CF373A24A0AE91" X-Archives-Salt: 1d209428-03bc-4e09-b795-0861c8165d0d X-Archives-Hash: 20a13a7abe9c67b126980ab8a9886023 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig68507764A7CF373A24A0AE91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07.02.2012 18:24, S=C3=A9bastien Fabbro wrote: > Hi, >=20 > We are contemplating the idea of switching the official science overlay= > to an external repository such as github. Here are some of the > advantages we would like to > get: > 1. easier to contribute > 2. specific issue tracker > 3. wiki >=20 > Please voice your concerns or ideas. >=20 > Thanks, Hi all, It's been a while and everybody had some time to think this proposal through. Summarizing: People that gave +1: me, bicatali, ottxor, tomka, jlec (provided automation is done), Jan Marte Simmons, People that gave -1: alexxy, rei4dan, andyspiros, Undecided? fbissey If I've missed anyone please shout. As I understand this allows us to proceed :) I've already created account on github and will try to work on mutual sync. When the latter is finished we can get things going. I'll keep you posted. Cheers, Kacper --------------enig68507764A7CF373A24A0AE91 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPQQIyAAoJEF0huFKJUZL5R40QAJUi1922I7beYZhv9exRhoOo 5tQFKHR8w+2PSKd4mnA2o1QFtsuaq53JsDGXEDCUB61EhGXNfwqy0sjtQRlDrDeL g0SjZlIXP4foPb/7rmlZd87SL1Hqsdh3RLnOArAi6CeSGUvrpl7xECdMCGopXAyP Dg3SokT/1ROURHrePkiyA6TmsQLNvVrPlDld0mg7ZqdbjKM75nX0Wl9vlEqW/G8R i63FsekD5opvFZ8gt9eYKE3XF/gCK72LvQ8ypcgm0YPnnGv479bQ4inI2y1I3P8h i9mxtTN5lRYU8ABfnm1mPWGf+HyYdVuRnzi4PewN7SrGcGcO6FWWxHY4DUn/8r3C vRqh/p3ku+C+0sPRTxVnYVhVferXSXU6Owm49v8CHpnpTMyXBjjTcb/oVZ/L3Dbl cmwNkbH6E8QZ6A56tauWZ7h/37O34+M+4wtAFsxlGqtYGyVyYcuE8PGfc1la+L+2 Ikpx1ppnWgrRq/aeYpw0Hk8ccV/56BZ6k52Ydc7ZXyleYzIlog/38zrIwBSDP/VF 1BYYNga4J+7ATdAFuHwHmT7CsEaS8bC1FN7dbmZqJ5ZK+YNeh6KJjAFcZPN1qJNO OTI90rYCUdw5L3DexgAN7qR5BZENQu5R2DAGypydAUkXECh38bVGGW4PaLTYakAY 1Y+T19D+ZEf+l0jf97ZA =F7Xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig68507764A7CF373A24A0AE91--