From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RvOyj-0007Qk-Qn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:03:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C33FEE072F for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D716BE062A for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paul.ics.kfa-juelich.de (ics6305.ics.kfa-juelich.de [134.94.119.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9F61B403E; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F337008.3080108@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:04:40 +0100 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120207 Thunderbird/10.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] moving the science overlay to github? References: <92cc0e1cd53d153e81228e46e0f72089@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> <20120208093508.GD5367@schlaumatte.Speedport_W_723V_Typ_A> <201202081302.17255.marten@xtal.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC1039892A324F4EFBCEE8337" X-Archives-Salt: 2f5e1eef-0d93-4652-b349-396419b1ac1e X-Archives-Hash: 166ca87a3c71b9d92dcc69cfa294d44d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC1039892A324F4EFBCEE8337 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/02/12 17:25, Christoph Junghans wrote: > 2012/2/8 Jan Marten Simons : >> Thomas Kahle: >>>> Actualy you can send pull request even now =3D) Its git. See for exa= mple >>>> linux kernel related work >>> >>> Sure, the New Yorker publishes short stories. In my experience this = is >>> a huge barrier for first time contributors. I'm seeing this with the= >>> offlineimap project which enforces the git-format-patch and mailing l= ist >>> pull-requests/review. There are people who just want to fix three li= nes >>> in the doc but don't want to get black belts in git-fu. Then sometim= es >>> the maintainers won't implement the 3 line change to the doc themselv= es >>> because they want proper credit for the original contributor, so afte= r >>> ~10 e-mails the original contributor tries git-email and fails to mee= t >>> the standards. Another couple of e-mails are required do explain >>> sign-off, reply-to headers, ... I'll stop here you get the point. >>> >>> IMHO using github or a self-hosted equivalent will make contributing >>> easier. Clone, commit, and to some web-thingie for the pull-request.= >> >> +1 >> > After reading all this, +1 for github. >=20 > Maybe that would be a good point to switch to thin manifests. >=20 > Christoph >=20 They are already thin since some time. --------------enigC1039892A324F4EFBCEE8337 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAk8zcAgACgkQgAnW8HDreRaJuQCgsWNa8OB6tBZCz3iW3CYztHll vDEAniwg7G8D1eJY4LicEeyYw9hxAnS/ =nka3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC1039892A324F4EFBCEE8337--