From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-science+bounces-1565-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Rv3QF-0004E2-OP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:02:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C5A1E07D0 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BE9E0728 for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [158.75.7.230] (unknown [158.75.7.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: xarthisius) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B9F91B4031 for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F32311B.8060708@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:23:55 +0100 From: Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111121 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] moving the science overlay to github? References: <CAA-OU2rWd_4_HvWh+nTGMTXMHU_PKXjTFa3CTzmWB3WtFvYCKQ@mail.gmail.com> <e5bae7f39136b7edff99102781684e18@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> <CANgp9kzpSFze7RuHzgbKpwmAfGtYbKZjdATP0LL9nHdSpzfCiw@mail.gmail.com> <CAA-OU2or2yZ_n7KSzmQ6Zibci=cYGbz8D4BKyzPFJBGRuGS+FA@mail.gmail.com> <1328650534.17863.12.camel@RD-OC> In-Reply-To: <1328650534.17863.12.camel@RD-OC> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAEF1B5CC0563AD8DDE7BF623" X-Archives-Salt: a1816c59-3a92-4194-99a3-c2d677511a52 X-Archives-Hash: 3d183a1d74fcfb008ec849b701452837 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAEF1B5CC0563AD8DDE7BF623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/07/2012 10:35 PM, My Th wrote: > O , 2012-02-07 13:13 -0800, S=C3=A9bastien Fabbro rakst=C4=ABja: >> 2. bugzilla + tag [science overlay] is a hack prone to human mistake >> that gives unnecessary work to bugs scanners, whereas a unified >> scm+issue system going straight to the dev >=20 > I don't see this as much of a problem. I prefer it as it is now when al= l > bug reports for certain package are in the same tracker instead of two > separate ones, depending on whether the particular ebuild has been > migrated to the main tree or not. There are few disadvantages of having overlay bugs on b.g.o: 1) bugs get lost in the noise, currently there are ~600 maintainer-wanted bugs, some of them may be interesting from our POV 2) people that are assigned to bugs are rarely people responsible for given package, in most cases those bugs are just assigned to sci@g.o. There several reasons to that, one e.g. contributor to sci overlay does not have b.g.o account. 3) bugs can be changed/resolved only by devs or reporter, unless you have edit privs Having more open tracker, would relieve us from much work while allowing contributors to take more control. Cheers, Kacper >> 3. wiki.g.o is up but not unified to a specific project, I have not >> seen a single sci contribution yet >=20 > They even have dedicated section for Projects&Community, just add there= > an entry for sci. There is not a single sci contribution only because > nobody has cared to write one. That wiki is good and it is the place I > would expect to find sci project's wiki if I would search for it. >=20 > Reinis --------------enigAEF1B5CC0563AD8DDE7BF623 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPMjEcAAoJEF0huFKJUZL5sFQP/RAp4CbG7QtV/DtgAK+MoxQ6 jS6+nsOAgkVEBx5WHCMQVHpFr+jkJw/KokE6XUbo8lxic03Z2Dn2efHXOHzd/6ji O8J00dSvBpD3w7V7X6874vT6dWyvMbZz7OHuls6Y54fkOgYtyENje+hK9WmpFeHM 1dRwGGmi6Kgz8qQjxomWWGyKSgAEZIddTcNzBJBbDYGiN2riT0Sf4Bm7phkHjbKb MFT16wOLseUnypM9vUVFCR/kMkTyqSUVjfzNd6riROlWeMzWpJAsZmMcx1rlTG2c uwRQSkrhqCInhDhgSEh2PQSS3wFZ1fsRvSmlISKh8+HKmjBTgw4twug58vVPNFGY XZW4KKNnBF9mxCSiyXN8V9hrjuE5jMuGVXKyTJrIm2/JO9VxDS0CIpz1cRdxo8nh TGN5mdSJGZWsF3aOxDLox0Hh5bvtGDklnXXznJVf6W6/KkN4Xqs8szq5UK8IbnYB 3ph/6qYJ5Ur1p7TDmA/Ih2+6xfXG+jpHg76yjeyYuWr10BFdJVq6iY2QcGgTJjmf FPayqb73MrjbwV92HVEDFs1RlU9LpjIs1nC2J15iDJx3C8FGDYszY8MXiKDIdbhF Ehqh1iJgvfuQGTtZbh8X/EI0sNjSE1RGnKwa/0WEr7ZtOBvIdAAYUVm26beO0/4h YqYdPonGugMlDFgeAm2e =g/dc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAEF1B5CC0563AD8DDE7BF623--