From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RuLPC-0006uU-CD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:02:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00534E0757 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D668DE077A for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (178-36-105-38.adsl.inetia.pl [178.36.105.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: xarthisius) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9225C1B403F for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F2FA1F1.2070500@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:48:33 +0100 From: Kacper Kowalik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120205 Thunderbird/10.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Commit signing in the overlay? References: <4F2F85AB.6080708@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2F85AB.6080708@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2E3027D992782998892AD2DC" X-Archives-Salt: ed77a4df-54d6-4378-9e22-ba63c44752d1 X-Archives-Hash: b4867af1593b8b8ff24e1d7d6be96148 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2E3027D992782998892AD2DC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.02.2012 08:47, justin wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > should we start commit signing like the kde [1] guys do in our overlay?= I just wanted to +1. We'll hopefully soon have it in main tree so it's better to get use to it. Main advantage, besides being fancy, is that it's backward compatible, so people without latest git/portage will just not notice. Cheers, Kacper --------------enig2E3027D992782998892AD2DC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPL6H1AAoJEF0huFKJUZL5FB4QAK34z9+VJfPEIu7duLOBFMYn oY6EtbE3jhrPXHYGjjukcvWIDHs5eqXWelMk95sTMGfr3VW5rW2cMWR7jGjN1kd0 dPzKAsuOj8AWGz9A25AolKQP8pDfKUzZtljiQX3py0HYg5lM+jvcGFoV683ijnpj H0dIztZPpXTbPJd0iG3BjynDtzP/h93367Mo7NiwVPk6oo7lGkQxdUbBdoICpyQ6 by5pn5mvmK1CF4ATwUezrzMTqfpJTEfqJywkBfBQ/Fr0AXWRYUW+VyHEO4eng8U3 fZf9vnuoEer8gtrl3hxwiLvedrh3zx6YmqjiljA6HAIzMO985Apnw4AmPSFq5kOC /KXQ1UYEGvYhy+vTCzBDQwg8adfyWuvhHan1FN5xuI2KxgNNHSFTyOdhcP4rUNfS jk2p8okYgjU6lk2Ql2+LXYnkc5CkJ05H7n/uEk8/9Tsfjo8cOkpaCc9SQclVNN34 ywzBd1J0oGCYbAaxofimFZ9yZyHjB+GkMUasTso4l5juEi19/YroxKx4V2hHtilb BUCHO3crNeUIdTRsr36/i30rjSaNF/G7BA6IswrFwPTO/XV05i8owl0HLZNqKz8W EFG/huJ5ZZxFNnM50dlh8RH2Hve0fL9mf81s1OJPsF9MGYe6PKxLPYeWzSbrW8Ac z5duGge42FGFdI7RQtRf =1auS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2E3027D992782998892AD2DC--