* [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
@ 2009-10-08 20:10 Johan Hattne
2009-10-08 20:28 ` Justin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hattne @ 2009-10-08 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hi;
It looks like pointless-1.3.15.tar.gz was pulled off the official ftp
server some time ago. I'm not familiar enough with pointless to know
whether I should ask for somebody to supply me with a copy of the
distfile or if the ebuild in the overlay should be retracted.
// Cheers; Johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2009-10-08 20:10 Johan Hattne
@ 2009-10-08 20:28 ` Justin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Justin @ 2009-10-08 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 713 bytes --]
Johan Hattne wrote:
> Hi;
>
> It looks like pointless-1.3.15.tar.gz was pulled off the official ftp
> server some time ago. I'm not familiar enough with pointless to know
> whether I should ask for somebody to supply me with a copy of the
> distfile or if the ebuild in the overlay should be retracted.
>
> // Cheers; Johan
>
>
Hi Johan,
I fixed it. For some reason they removed all versions >1.3.12. I
mirrored the .15 tarball on our servers so just sync and emerge. But be
careful, I don't know why upstream removed it.
If you ever have problems again, don't hesitate to ask here, in out irc
channel #gentoo-science on freenode, or the commiter to the overlay
directly.
justin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
@ 2010-01-21 18:58 Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 19:13 ` Justin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hattne @ 2010-01-21 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hullo again;
The 1.4.7 pointless distfile is off the Cambridge ftp. Instead, they've
released 1.4.8. The latter version builds just fine with the 1.4.7
ebuild, however it fails three of the tests--I don't know what's wrong yet.
// Cheers; Johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 18:58 [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless Johan Hattne
@ 2010-01-21 19:13 ` Justin
2010-01-21 19:35 ` Johan Hattne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Justin @ 2010-01-21 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 355 bytes --]
On 21/01/10 19:58, Johan Hattne wrote:
> Hullo again;
>
> The 1.4.7 pointless distfile is off the Cambridge ftp. Instead, they've
> released 1.4.8. The latter version builds just fine with the 1.4.7
> ebuild, however it fails three of the tests--I don't know what's wrong yet.
>
> // Cheers; Johan
>
>
Yeah I know the tests are broken.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 19:13 ` Justin
@ 2010-01-21 19:35 ` Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 19:39 ` Justin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hattne @ 2010-01-21 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
On 01/21/10 13:13, Justin wrote:
> On 21/01/10 19:58, Johan Hattne wrote:
>> Hullo again;
>>
>> The 1.4.7 pointless distfile is off the Cambridge ftp. Instead, they've
>> released 1.4.8. The latter version builds just fine with the 1.4.7
>> ebuild, however it fails three of the tests--I don't know what's wrong yet.
>>
>> // Cheers; Johan
>>
>>
> Yeah I know the tests are broken.
OK, then I know.
While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is
anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept
patches to that end?
// Cheers; Johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 19:35 ` Johan Hattne
@ 2010-01-21 19:39 ` Justin
2010-01-21 21:53 ` Denis Dupeyron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Justin @ 2010-01-21 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 892 bytes --]
On 21/01/10 20:35, Johan Hattne wrote:
> On 01/21/10 13:13, Justin wrote:
>> On 21/01/10 19:58, Johan Hattne wrote:
>>> Hullo again;
>>>
>>> The 1.4.7 pointless distfile is off the Cambridge ftp. Instead, they've
>>> released 1.4.8. The latter version builds just fine with the 1.4.7
>>> ebuild, however it fails three of the tests--I don't know what's wrong yet.
>>>
>>> // Cheers; Johan
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah I know the tests are broken.
>
> OK, then I know.
>
> While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is
> anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept
> patches to that end?
>
> // Cheers; Johan
>
Same to me, I have a prefixed science package git overlay. Currently
only nmr stuff, but I am also porting xray packages. Drop the patches to me.
https://gitweb.j-schmitz.net/pub/?p=sciprefix.git;a=summary
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 19:39 ` Justin
@ 2010-01-21 21:53 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-01-21 22:16 ` Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 22:22 ` Justin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Denis Dupeyron @ 2010-01-21 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Justin <justin@j-schmitz.net> wrote:
> On 21/01/10 20:35, Johan Hattne wrote:
>> While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is
>> anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept
>> patches to that end?
> Same to me, I have a prefixed science package git overlay. Currently
> only nmr stuff, but I am also porting xray packages. Drop the patches to me.
Talking about this, prefix was officially approved with eapi3 (not the
original eapi3 now called eapi4) a few days ago. So feel free to push
all your prefix stuff to the official tree whenever you feel like it,
or to harass a dev to push it for you.
Denis.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 21:53 ` Denis Dupeyron
@ 2010-01-21 22:16 ` Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 23:51 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-01-21 22:22 ` Justin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hattne @ 2010-01-21 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
On 01/21/10 15:53, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Justin <justin@j-schmitz.net> wrote:
>> On 21/01/10 20:35, Johan Hattne wrote:
>>> While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is
>>> anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept
>>> patches to that end?
>> Same to me, I have a prefixed science package git overlay. Currently
>> only nmr stuff, but I am also porting xray packages. Drop the patches to me.
>
> Talking about this, prefix was officially approved with eapi3 (not the
> original eapi3 now called eapi4) a few days ago. So feel free to push
> all your prefix stuff to the official tree whenever you feel like it,
> or to harass a dev to push it for you.
Great! Any reference on that? The prefix list (or gentoo-alt, rather)
has been remarkably silent on the issue, and
// Cheers; Johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 21:53 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-01-21 22:16 ` Johan Hattne
@ 2010-01-21 22:22 ` Justin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Justin @ 2010-01-21 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 952 bytes --]
On 21/01/10 22:53, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Justin <justin@j-schmitz.net> wrote:
>> On 21/01/10 20:35, Johan Hattne wrote:
>>> While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is
>>> anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept
>>> patches to that end?
>> Same to me, I have a prefixed science package git overlay. Currently
>> only nmr stuff, but I am also porting xray packages. Drop the patches to me.
>
> Talking about this, prefix was officially approved with eapi3 (not the
> original eapi3 now called eapi4) a few days ago. So feel free to push
> all your prefix stuff to the official tree whenever you feel like it,
> or to harass a dev to push it for you.
>
> Denis.
>
I am currently porting all packages I am mainting to be eprefix ready. I
hope it will not take more the a couple of weeks until I am able to push
everything into the tree.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 22:16 ` Johan Hattne
@ 2010-01-21 23:51 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-02-21 5:47 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Denis Dupeyron @ 2010-01-21 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Johan Hattne
<johan.hattne@utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
> Great! Any reference on that? The prefix list (or gentoo-alt, rather)
> has been remarkably silent on the issue, and
You can check the council meeting summary of last month where prefix
is approved pending some final actions [1], and this month's meeting
log (the summary should make it to the page any time now) for the
final approval of prefix and the new EAPI3 [2]. You can also emerge
=app-doc/pms-3 where EAPI3 and thus prefix is specified. It's a good
time to start using this and send your comments to the prefix team
about the available documentation.
Denis.
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091207-summary.txt
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100118.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-01-21 23:51 ` Denis Dupeyron
@ 2010-02-21 5:47 ` Donnie Berkholz
2010-02-21 8:43 ` justin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2010-02-21 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
On 16:51 Thu 21 Jan , Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Johan Hattne
> <johan.hattne@utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
> > Great! Any reference on that? The prefix list (or gentoo-alt, rather)
> > has been remarkably silent on the issue, and
>
> You can check the council meeting summary of last month where prefix
> is approved pending some final actions [1], and this month's meeting
> log (the summary should make it to the page any time now) for the
> final approval of prefix and the new EAPI3 [2]. You can also emerge
> =app-doc/pms-3 where EAPI3 and thus prefix is specified. It's a good
> time to start using this and send your comments to the prefix team
> about the available documentation.
>
> Denis.
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091207-summary.txt
> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100118.txt
Is there some guide around on "Porting ebuilds from EAPI=2 to EAPI=3 for
people who don't pay any attention to anything on mailing lists"?
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Science team developer
Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
2010-02-21 5:47 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2010-02-21 8:43 ` justin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: justin @ 2010-02-21 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1626 bytes --]
On 21/02/10 06:47, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:51 Thu 21 Jan , Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Johan Hattne
>> <johan.hattne@utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
>>> Great! Any reference on that? The prefix list (or gentoo-alt, rather)
>>> has been remarkably silent on the issue, and
>>
>> You can check the council meeting summary of last month where prefix
>> is approved pending some final actions [1], and this month's meeting
>> log (the summary should make it to the page any time now) for the
>> final approval of prefix and the new EAPI3 [2]. You can also emerge
>> =app-doc/pms-3 where EAPI3 and thus prefix is specified. It's a good
>> time to start using this and send your comments to the prefix team
>> about the available documentation.
>>
>> Denis.
>>
>> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091207-summary.txt
>> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100118.txt
>
> Is there some guide around on "Porting ebuilds from EAPI=2 to EAPI=3 for
> people who don't pay any attention to anything on mailing lists"?
>
No there isn't. But for most ebuilds there is no big change to EAPI="2".
Only exception are ebuilds using the python.eclass [1]. There you likely
will have a lot of work and the chance is high that you hit a bug in the
eclass. So I would recommend contacting Arfrever in any case of
problems. He is really willing to help us.
app-doc/pms includes the EAPI cheat paper from fauli.
[1]
http://dev.gentoo.org/~Arfrever/Guide_on_writing_ebuilds_supporting_installation_for_multiple_Python_versions
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-21 8:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-21 18:58 [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 19:13 ` Justin
2010-01-21 19:35 ` Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 19:39 ` Justin
2010-01-21 21:53 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-01-21 22:16 ` Johan Hattne
2010-01-21 23:51 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-02-21 5:47 ` Donnie Berkholz
2010-02-21 8:43 ` justin
2010-01-21 22:22 ` Justin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-08 20:10 Johan Hattne
2009-10-08 20:28 ` Justin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox