From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRjvg-0002tf-Bx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:40:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDE69E038C; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.48.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE85E038C for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 3941617382E; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:40:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on 0815-web.localdomain X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Message-ID: <4A60470B.5040401@j-schmitz.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:40:27 +0200 From: Justin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090628) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-biology/blast-db fails digest verification References: <1247750772.17144.5.camel@localhost> <4A5F4C65.3030704@j-schmitz.net> <148d282c0907170140l7538a12t4a3091449bc271ad@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <148d282c0907170140l7538a12t4a3091449bc271ad@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7C50E45AFF03D3964203166F" X-Archives-Salt: 59bee687-80e5-444c-9e28-56fa333ae250 X-Archives-Hash: a357ce55676e02ad0d82b76b16a63c7b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7C50E45AFF03D3964203166F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =C5=81ukasz P. Michalik schrieb: > 2009/7/16 Justin : >> please redigest it locally. As it isn't a versioned tarball upstream, = it >> is very likely that it will be brocken. perhaps you should ask one of >> our devs if a versioned tarball could be mirrored on our dist-mirrors.= >> >=20 > Without looking at the ebuild, isn't that a perfect case for SRC_URI ar= rows? >=20 > -- > Pozdrwiam, > =C5=81ukasz Michalik >=20 No because the changes in upstreams tarball will still remain. --------------enig7C50E45AFF03D3964203166F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpgRwsACgkQgAnW8HDreRZe2wCfVnpuzwC2GMBqbJYlRnlN0imR s7sAniYeDPl1v4n9lyToah9OwPGtBOKs =j6/3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7C50E45AFF03D3964203166F--