From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRTEg-0006zH-G3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:51:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66F97E0499; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.48.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3197BE0499 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 85D7217382E; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:51:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on 0815-web.localdomain X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Message-ID: <4A5F4C65.3030704@j-schmitz.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:51:01 +0200 From: Justin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090628) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-biology/blast-db fails digest verification References: <1247750772.17144.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1247750772.17144.5.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig41E4D7A2839ABBE6B68DAF52" X-Archives-Salt: dd568f8b-dfc1-4630-bc1c-7c50e7034661 X-Archives-Hash: 181116a552956c6f58b5ab0285a55566 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig41E4D7A2839ABBE6B68DAF52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bj=C3=B6rn Thorwirth schrieb: > Hi! > I just noticed this digest verification error. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Bjoern 'Thorwirth >=20 Hi Bjoern, please redigest it locally. As it isn't a versioned tarball upstream, it is very likely that it will be brocken. perhaps you should ask one of our devs if a versioned tarball could be mirrored on our dist-mirrors. justin --------------enig41E4D7A2839ABBE6B68DAF52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpfTGUACgkQgAnW8HDreRaGCACfa5k6yMn7vAG1kOuNSTl68IpA oQcAn1JqzHlhLSoTwKV9Dqe6iv07CQbF =B0fE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig41E4D7A2839ABBE6B68DAF52--