From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4uEA-0002uI-JC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:24:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBJ8NZm4016778; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:23:35 GMT Received: from j-schmitz.net (lvps87-230-9-156.dedicated.hosteurope.de [87.230.9.156]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBJ8NYmK016773 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:23:35 GMT Received: by j-schmitz.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9519161E000A; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:23:34 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1-gr1 (2007-05-02) on lvps87-230-9-156.dedicated.hosteurope.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_DYNAMIC, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.2.1-gr1 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (ip-62-143-21-105.1411O-CUD12K-04.ish.de [62.143.21.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by j-schmitz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F020F61E0008 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:23:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4768D505.1070401@j-schmitz.net> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:23:33 +0100 From: Justin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071218) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] emerge failed References: <4766BD88.6020200@j-schmitz.net> <20071218220448.GE24034@supernova> In-Reply-To: <20071218220448.GE24034@supernova> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e47d1dfd-acc5-48d8-99ba-12379863e452 X-Archives-Hash: c555bd3f52decd5d792a70a780d301d1 Donnie Berkholz schrieb: > On 19:18 Mon 17 Dec , Justin wrote: > >> Hi all. >> I tried to emerge coot-0.3.3 with new-interface which failed >> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202599). Now I recognised that >> at my office computer, which is basically of the same software setup, >> coot emerged with the 1.99 version of gtkglarea. >> My question now is, how can I easily compare the systems (Useflags used, >> packages emerged...) to figure out the difference. >> > > You can install portage-utils and run `qlist -I -U -v packagename` to > show the versions and USE flags of various packages. Relevant ones would > probably be coot, gtkglarea, maybe gtkglext. I'm not really sure why it > would even be looking for gtkglarea with new-interface on, though, since > that should only be for the old gtk-1 interface. > > Since that bug shows that a header wasn't found at > /usr/include/gtkgl/gtkglarea.h, it might be worth checking whether that > file exists. > This file belongs to x11-libs/gtkglarea-1.2.3-r1. So this package must be emerged for coot. > I've got some newer ebuilds around for 0.4 prereleases that I could add > to the tree masked, if that would help. > I thought for myself writing an ebuild for that, but I didn't found the sources. But I will be a happy tester if you need. The same, if you need help maintaining packages, i offer my help. The science thing should enlarge in gentoo. I wrote a couple of ebuild for my private-overlay, which work fine for me. Perhaps there is some need for that. Some packages are Arpwarp, xds, cara, and i'm working on phaser or rewriting the ccp4 ebuild so that it could emerge phaser as a dep. The only thing which im not sure about is the legal thing with those ebuilds. So if you could teach me which license the writing of ebuild alows and which, I publish them. Thanks justin > Thanks, > Donnie > -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list