From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-science+bounces-512-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HkPij-0004mZ-Gs
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 19:15:05 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45JDlJu003404;
Sat, 5 May 2007 19:13:47 GMT
Received: from alnrmhc12.comcast.net (alnrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.225.92])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45JDjnJ003351
for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 May 2007 19:13:46 GMT
Received: from [71.237.219.233] (unknown[71.237.219.233])
by comcast.net (alnrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <20070505191343b1200f6tlve>; Sat, 5 May 2007 19:13:44 +0000
Message-ID: <463CD766.3000407@cesmail.net>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 12:13:42 -0700
From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] TeXmacs-1.0.6.9-r1 compile problems
References: <617608.71773.qm@web56701.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705050243010.18631@star.inp.nsk.su> <463BD6F1.5010404@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <463BD6F1.5010404@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: e9723b92-631d-4450-9a83-3afef53e743a
X-Archives-Hash: 4f5c84d58dceae487af12843ae4c03a4
C Y wrote:
> OK, I checked my system. I'm using guile 1.8.1-r3, but I had to compile
> with the "depreciated" flag set in order to support TeXmacs.
>
> Just re-confirmed - with that configuration, TeXmacs builds successfully.
>
> Cheers,
> CY
>
> Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 May 2007, C Y wrote:
>>
>>> Which flags did you compile guile with? I think there needs to be one
>>> active about supporting some kind of older functionality, but the
>>> details escape me now. I had build failures until I fixed that - I'll
>>> check tonight and see which one it was. The TeXmacs ebuild really
>>> should check for it.
>>>
>> The latest stable guile in the portage tree is 1.6.7. TeXmacs compiles
>> fine with it. When guile-1.8.* will become stable, we'll have to do
>> something with the TeXmacs ebuild. But, maybe, TeXmacs will be usable
>> with 1.8 before that (?)
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>
>
Has that been pushed upstream to the TeXmacs team?
--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list